• Announcements

    • Brian

      Introducing T|I Marketplace/Classifieds!   11/24/16

      After a long wait, Tech|Inferno now has a Marketplace/Classifieds section where all registered (promoted and above) members can participate in selling, trading and seeking out items. This service is free to all members to use as they wish. Currently all ads last for a period of 14 days before they expire for promoted users. Those users belonging to T|I Elite, Contributor, Developer and Moderator have access to 30 day ad periods that are featured   Some easy rules to remember: Do not post multiple ads of the same product. Do not advertise here if you are a retailer or business. You must contact Tech|Inferno for advertising space. Keep ads civil, do not try to lowball members. You may contact them in private via PM if you feel their price is not to your liking. Harassing members will result in an infraction. It is recommended you have Heatware/eBay feedback to establish trading credibility.    Tech|Inferno assumes no liability for any sales posted in the Classified section. Always use common sense when buying/selling with traders and ask for their heatware/ebay feedback!   Enjoy!

30 posts in this topic

Ah, nice. So it is a 780m (Kepler) clocked 180MHz faster then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like a meaningless annual refresh. 20nm is still several months out.

At least it will drop 780m prices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm looking for something that's 2x the performance of the 680m and plan on going with whatever that card is in SLI (980m perhaps - 20nm Maxwell?).

I'm just surprised nVidia decided to release the 880m as a third time around rebrand. Curious to see what the 128-bit lineup will be.

Granted I also plan on moving this year as well as taking my kids to Disney next year, so this whole desire may not fit in my plans. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was hoping for GK110, but I guess they won't do such a thing again after the 480m... :D

880m makes absolutely zero sense at this time, but looking back at Fermi it seems that this is the way it works nowadays... 485m -> 580m -> 675m. Heck, they even sold at least one Fermi chip named as 700 series.

This situation is similar, Nvidia is just milking the cow, even worse than AMD. There was no reason to wait one year for the 780m, the could have done that from the very start.

Now if they released a GK110 based mobile card, say with 10SMX, that would have been an impressive move. But this 8 GB version of the 780m makes no sense at all. Every 780m can handle the increased clocks easily 24/7.

EDIT: Btw., 8GB will overclock worse than 4GB. Especially if they stay with Elpida, hahaha

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was hoping for GK110, but I guess they won't do such a thing again after the 480m... :D

880m makes absolutely zero sense at this time, but looking back at Fermi it seems that this is the way it works nowadays... 485m -> 580m -> 675m. Heck, they even sold at least one Fermi chip named as 700 series.

This situation is similar, Nvidia is just milking the cow, even worse than AMD. There was no reason to wait one year for the 780m, the could have done that from the very start.

Now if they released a GK110 based mobile card, say with 10SMX, that would have been an impressive move. But this 8 GB version of the 780m makes no sense at all. Every 780m can handle the increased clocks easily 24/7.

EDIT: Btw., 8GB will overclock worse than 4GB. Especially if they stay with Elpida, hahaha

Can you explain why an 8gb card will overclock worse than a 4gb one? I think you are right about the memory, I dont know any game which uses above 2.5gb vram on a single 1080p screen and I really doubt whether these things are powerful enough for 4k. Unless you count modded skyrim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The memory will overclock worse, in general high-density chips overclock worse than such with lower capacity.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I wonder what AMD has planned for the top card in the annual marketing refresh? Do you think there's any chance that they'll put a tahiti on a mobile card? I think it could be done with a substantial voltage and clock drop to get thermals down to say 580m levels, but I don't think they'll put such a big expensive die on a mobile card, especially since nvidia did the marketing BS of putting 8GB on a card, so AMD will have to waste money doing the same or else people who don't know better will get the nvidia since it has more memory.

It'd be a hell of a fun card though :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I dunno, I once read about an R9 M290X, but that seemed to be a renamed 8970m. Thaiti surely would be a lot of fun, I was hoping for a mobil GK110 from Nvidia.... but noooo. I guess it won't happen from team red either. :( AMD didn't never push any current / last gen mobile card except the 8970m / 7970m... even though the 7870m would have made a great MXM card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AMD didn't never push any current / last gen mobile card except the 8970m / 7970m... even though the 7870m would have made a great MXM card.
Could you explain that last part about making a great MXM card? Isn't it already MXM (and I assume you meant 7970M instead of 7870M)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well 20nm seems unlikely to be out until the 2nd half of 2014, so maybe we will get a big chip on a mobile card. There has been no significant improvement since the 7970m released in may 2012...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Could you explain that last part about making a great MXM card? Isn't it already MXM (and I assume you meant 7970M instead of 7870M)?

The 7870M was never actually released. It would have been great as it would have been an ideal compromise between power consumption and performance. If I remember correctly, Samsung was the only manufacturer that used that chip in one of their notebooks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The 7870M was never actually released. It would have been great as it would have been an ideal compromise between power consumption and performance. If I remember correctly, Samsung was the only manufacturer that used that chip in one of their notebooks.

Interesting, thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can you explain why an 8gb card will overclock worse than a 4gb one? I think you are right about the memory, I dont know any game which uses above 2.5gb vram on a single 1080p screen and I really doubt whether these things are powerful enough for 4k. Unless you count modded skyrim.

A greater probability of one of the memory chips not being able to handle the overclock, as all the chips will have to run only as fast as the slowest one can go. The more chips you have the greater the chance of having one included that won't overclock well.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just when I bought a 780m... Just my luck.:50_002:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Darn i was really hoping that this card would be more impressive than a refresh. nvidia keeps teasing Maxwell but so far they aren't delivering the hype

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

for two months show Refreshed Clevo models, as it is known will also 880M, maybe also will update cooling? , Maybe Memory Cooling By the way will be on the other side of the PCB, that was a big surprise for pushing their clocks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw how it looks ES :peaceful: first looks = OEM product :acne:

is the OEM look and will not be cooling the bones of VRAM on the other side hmmmm SLI+XM look interesting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I shoulda skipped the SLI'ed 765's after all... I'm shooting for at least a ten-year service life on my P370SM (Sager NP9380) with two projected mid-life rebuild/upgrades assuming parts are still available that far out.

Hmmm... been slobbering over this since I first spotted it a couple days ago. Starting to wonder if I shoulda skipped the 2x 765M SLI upgrade...

A grand each for an i7-4940MX and two of these... figuring out how to afford it all is really gonna suck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe I shoulda skipped the SLI'ed 765's after all... I'm shooting for at least a ten-year service life on my P370SM (Sager NP9380) with two projected mid-life rebuild/upgrades assuming parts are still available that far out.

Hmmm... been slobbering over this since I first spotted it a couple days ago. Starting to wonder if I shoulda skipped the 2x 765M SLI upgrade...

A grand each for an i7-4940MX and two of these... figuring out how to afford it all is really gonna suck.

Considering that 20nm Maxwell is likely going to be coming out towards the end of this year why don't you wait for 20nm. It could give you almost twice the performance of a similar 28nm part. Then upgrade again sometime during the backend of Volta perhaps in about 3-4yrs from now. Haha, long range plans, ok, maybe it's a bit hard to predict 4yrs down the line!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe I shoulda skipped the SLI'ed 765's after all... I'm shooting for at least a ten-year service life on my P370SM (Sager NP9380) with two projected mid-life rebuild/upgrades assuming parts are still available that far out.

Hmmm... been slobbering over this since I first spotted it a couple days ago. Starting to wonder if I shoulda skipped the 2x 765M SLI upgrade...

A grand each for an i7-4940MX and two of these... figuring out how to afford it all is really gonna suck.

The 4930mx costs so much that I'd go with a P370EM for a $400 3920xm instead. Just as fast CPU wise, but no 780m support (680m is close though). The P370SM has better cooling, but with the cash saved you can buy that separately and still have over $500 in savings.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By bluewind55
      Hi folks,
       
             I've been trying to get into using Nvidia 3 vision but I've been unable to get a monitor that can do 120Hz or better to work with my  2014 EON 17SLX laptop with SLI GTX 880M video cards and its Thunderbolt port.
      I've tried connection 4 different gaming monitors on it (3x Dell S2716DG and 1 ASUS P279Q) and all of there mostly freezes up my laptop and give the "No signal detected from DisplayPort" error when I connect them to my laptop's Thunderbolt Port.   During the few times that laptop doesn't freeze and is able to see detect the connected monitor, the monitor itself will still show the save no signal error regardless of which frequency or resolution that I set the monitor to from the nVidia control panel.   The monitors do work if I connect them via a HDMI cable but that only gets me 60Hz frequency which doesn't work for 3d nVidia vision.   I've tested my thunderbolt port/mDP to DisplayPort cable with another 60 Hz Dell u2412m and it works without a hitch.  I've tested the same cable and Dell S2716DG on a friend's MacBook Pro and it's able to see the monitor and the monitor was able to use the 120Hz frequency at 2560x1440 resolution.  So, the cables does work and so does the monitor but just NOT for my Laptop.
       
             I've tried downgrading my video drivers to their original and to the latest drivers but none of it had any affect on the problem.  I've tried disabling G-SYNC from the nVidia Control Panel.  I tried disabling the SLI.  I've also tried setting my main display to a secondary display before connecting the 120Hz + monitors to the laptop.  But nothing worked.  I've talked with Dell, NVida, and OriginPC but didn't get any resolution.
       
             Has anyone gotten their 880M video card to work with the Dell S2716DG, ASUS P279Q, or any 120Hz+ monitor?  I'm curious if this problem is unique to me only or I'm doing something wrong with my settings.
    • By Spats
      Greetings everybody,

      I have an MSI Whitebook (MS-1763) that was purchased barebone- no CPU/RAM/HDD, just Mobo and GTX 780M.
      As many MSI users know, the optimus driver support can be strange- it required a specific install order: intel VGA first, then MSI-flavor Nvidia drivers only (although when I first went through this I was not modding INF files).
      It also seems like the Whitebook BIOS cannot be upgraded- under "Advanced" the EFI Update option is absent. My BIOS version is E1763IG6.70C

      Anyway I recently saw a chance on ebay to cheaply upgrade my 4700MQ to a 4800MQ and 780M to 880M.
      I bought both and swapped them in. The 4800MQ had no problem. At first I didn't update the Intel VGA driver but after problems (see next) I reinstalled them (via MSI site).
      The 880M wouldn't install. At first I tried the official driver from Nvidia, next I tried the official MSI driver for the GT70 Dominator Pro (appeared to be the same 1763 haswell platform but with an 880M). Both installers would fail to find compatible hardware, so I disabled automatic Windows drivers, disabled Driver Signature checking, and started modding INF files.
      The card appears in Device Manager as the generic Microsoft Display device (or whatever).
      The hardware ID for the card is  PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_1198&SUBSYS_05AA1462&REV_A1
       
      Once I got the hang of modding INF files, both installlers would pass the compatibility check and proceed to the installation. However after selecting Custom/Express the installer would fail. It would pass the "Preparing" stage and get about 30 seconds into the installation before notifying me that it had failed.
      After the failure, in the device manager the generic Microsoft Display device disappeared and "Unknown Device" appeared under Other Devices. It still has the correct hardware ID.
      I tried modding nv_dispi.INF after that, but no change. I tried modding the 780M driver for the 2od, same result.

      Can anyone shed some light on this? Experience with updating or upgrading a Whitebook? Successfully installed an 880M with the 05AA subsystem? Think the BIOS is somehow the problem?
      I'm very close to selling off the card- but I've already sold my 780M. If I did buy another 880M or 980M, I'm concerned the same problem will occur. Don't make me buy back my old card!
    • By szumial
      Hello!
      I am a new to techinferno - what brought me here is an issue with a Precision M6700 I bought myself lately. The laptop came with no GPU in it, however I have a GTX 880m that fits it's MXM slot. When I plugged the card in I though it was all I needed to do - I'm used to desktop upgrades, so I thought - it fits - why not? Turns out the PC's BIOS can't figure out what card is in it - with Optimus "off" I can see "unknown video card" with 8GBs of RAM. Windows 10 x64 Anniversary Edition works and recognizes the GPU as "Microsoft Universal Video Adapter", but the HWid suggests it's a GTX880 - in fact I can even see it properly detected by GPU-Z.
       
      So I browsed through lots of topics on upgrading, modding and customizing drivers but none of the methods worked for me, apart from one - Mr Fox's modded desktop drivers. I managed to install all the nVidia components, yet can't get the card working properly - launched Bioshock Infinite to see if it is on and it wasn't. Apparently my M6700 wants to perform only on Intel HD graphics from the CPU (3940XM). I tried flashing different vbios, updated the Dell bios to the latest one (A15), and tried modding NV drivers - no luck so far. Installing drivers (DSE turned off obviously) sometimes gives a post "no compatible hardware was found" and at other times with different mods and versions I get a message that it was all recognized, yet the driver "migh have been corrupted or smth"...
       
      I still believe that it is possible to make it work if it's only a software issue. Question is - how deep do you have to get into modding to make it work? Is the GTX 880m even worth the effort? Maybe I should search for a way to mess with M6700 BIOS? You might wonder why I want it - the answer is simple - I don't want a Quadro card here as I see a potential for some gaming on the workstation which has excellent build quality and great computing power.
       
      That's when I come to you asking for help - I've seen people upgrading their laptops with the impossible, so I believe there's still hope.
       
      Other useful info: I have a spare Quadro K5100 to try out, but from what I've read, there might be issues with that one as well...
       
      edit
       
      If anyone reads the thread - I was succesful with the upgrade - everything installed and working. I wish it was more stable, but still it runs great. If you need any tips, just PM me
    • By Shiroe
      Hello all
      First sorry for my english and olso if i dont use tu good search option
       
      My friend have same problem with Alienware m18x r2 880m sli on Windows 10
      Hi instal drives and all card work but problem is with throlling. I give him unlocked bios A10 but there is new problem
      Hi have no throlling buy now dont work sli option. Hi cant turn it on.
      If he go back to orginal bios A12 then sli is working but he get throlling back.
       
      I see that same people here have 880m sli on m18x r2 but cant find how they do that and have no throlling options.
      I will be greatful for yours help. If you need same more information then say and i will try to pust here
       
      Beast regards
      Dariusz
    • By gaffycool
      Hi everyone,
      I am having issues with my gtx 880m. I currently have a m18x r1 unlocked a05 bios and modded drivers (368.69 also tired 372.90)
       
      basically when im playing battlefront the game plays for about 1 min, and then crashes and I got this direct x error message on screen (shown in pic below)
      I managed to fix this error by turning on vertical sync in settings in the game and also in the nvidia control panel (it was set to auto, or adaptive and I changed this to on), and this fixed this create texture error.
       
      Now I am getting a completely new error and I was able to play the game for now more than 1 min, usually around 10-12 mins before crashing, i am now seeing a new error,
       
      directx function "DX11 Renderer::tryMap" failed with DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED ("The video card has been physically reomved from the system, or a driver upgrade for the video card has occurred. ").
       
      I have tried to change drivers, change clock speeds, turn off overclocking and running everything on low, I have also tried to delete the ndvi64.api file from system32 as suggested in an ea forum, and still no luck.
       
      Anyone else had this error? took me 3 days to finally get the gtx 880m to work in the mx18 r1 and now the only game that plays is battlefield, which works floorlessly on ultra for 4+ hours game play constantly with no issues. but its just when I play battlefront it crashes
       
      ive tried to even do the directx web installer to install latest files and still didnt work..
       
      any help would be appreciated and im sure would help out alot of mx18r1 users or gtx 880m users out there.
       
      thanks
       

       
      then I managed to fix this error