Ethrem Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 Anyone else think this could cause failures when messing with voltage? The solder point is there but it has no VRM while the 970M has all 4.http://rjtech.com/shop/images/detailed/DSC01680.jpgKind of worrying for me with all this sudden lock down of overclocking and such. Why would they remove a VRM? Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Player2 Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 Anyone else think this could cause failures when messing with voltage? The solder point is there but it has no VRM while the 970M has all 4.http://rjtech.com/shop/images/detailed/DSC01680.jpgKind of worrying for me with all this sudden lock down of overclocking and such. Why would they remove a VRM? Sent from my Nexus 6 using TapatalkYou Wana no what's funny. When I ordered my 980m from hidevolution and opened the card from it package I looked inside the package because I thought some of the chips fell off because there were blank spots on the card were a chip would go that weren't like that on my other cards.lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethrem Posted February 14, 2015 Author Share Posted February 14, 2015 Makes me wonder if it is indeed an engineering defect that they don't want to own up to and that we have ticking time bombs on our hands if we touch the voltage. Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khenglish Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 The chips you are referring to are high-side and low-side power FET combo chips. Usually one chip is just a low side-FET or a high-side FET, but Nvidia uses chips with a high-side and low-side combined on one chip. These are involved with voltage regulation, but they are not the VRM. The VRM is located on the back side of the card. Power FETs are responsible for powering the core, while the VRM controls the power FETs. All current to the core travels through the power FETs, which in the case of the 980m are 3 combo chips.Now that that's cleared up...The 980m has 3 power phases while the 680m, 780m, 880m, and 970m all have 2. On the 980m each phase has just one chip, while older cards and the 970m have 2 on each phase. This does mean that each chip must pass more current, but overall there is less strain on the voltage regulation. There are 2 reasons for this. One is there is a 3rd inductor. Inductors dump a lot of heat out onto the card because they are fairly resistive, and having a 3rd to split the current load reduces heat output significantly. Other reason why the 980m is better is because having 2 chips in parallel is not a purely positive thing. The 2nd chip on the phase means that the VRM must push and pull twice as much charge to turn the FETs in the chip on and off. You want to switch back and forth between high-side being on, and low-side being on, and vice-verse as fast as possible. The longer it takes means lower efficiency and more heat put out. The 2nd chip per phase slows down the switching speed.So combining the positives of the 3rd inductor and faster switching speeds, the 980m seems to me to have better power delivery than the 970m or earlier cards. 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethrem Posted February 14, 2015 Author Share Posted February 14, 2015 Thanks for putting that to rest. Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 The chips you are referring to are high-side and low-side power FET combo chips. Usually one chip is just a low side-FET or a high-side FET, but Nvidia uses chips with a high-side and low-side combined on one chip. These are involved with voltage regulation, but they are not the VRM. The VRM is located on the back side of the card. Power FETs are responsible for powering the core, while the VRM controls the power FETs. All current to the core travels through the power FETs, which in the case of the 980m are 3 combo chips.Now that that's cleared up...The 980m has 3 power phases while the 680m, 780m, 880m, and 970m all have 2. On the 980m each phase has just one chip, while older cards and the 970m have 2 on each phase. This does mean that each chip must pass more current, but overall there is less strain on the voltage regulation. There are 2 reasons for this. One is there is a 3rd inductor. Inductors dump a lot of heat out onto the card because they are fairly resistive, and having a 3rd to split the current load reduces heat output significantly. Other reason why the 980m is better is because having 2 chips in parallel is not a purely positive thing. The 2nd chip on the phase means that the VRM must push and pull twice as much charge to turn the FETs in the chip on and off. You want to switch back and forth between high-side being on, and low-side being on, and vice-verse as fast as possible. The longer it takes means lower efficiency and more heat put out. The 2nd chip per phase slows down the switching speed.So combining the positives of the 3rd inductor and faster switching speeds, the 980m seems to me to have better power delivery than the 970m or earlier cards.Cheers Khenglish, that's very enlightening. How did you find out / determine all of that about the power delivery systems of the new Maxwell cards?Looks like a lack of adequate power supply is not the reason for the ban on overclocking - because the power delivery systems of the new Maxwell cards are as good (970M) or better (980M) than the previous Kepler cards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khenglish Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Cheers Khenglish, that's very enlightening. How did you find out / determine all of that about the power delivery systems of the new Maxwell cards?Looks like a lack of adequate power supply is not the reason for the ban on overclocking - because the power delivery systems of the new Maxwell cards are as good (970M) or better (980M) than the previous Kepler cards.Power phases take up a large amount of pcb area and are very consistent between boards, so they're easy to spot from a picture. 1 inductor = 1 power phase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Power phases take up a large amount of pcb area and are very consistent between boards, so they're easy to spot from a picture. 1 inductor = 1 power phase.Ah, ok, cool, I see what you've done, you've combined your knowledge of inductor and FET Combo chip arrangement with your observation that there is an extra inductor on the 980M card and a more efficient arrangement of FET Combo chips to marry with those inductors. You've used your engineering knowledge to come to that conclusion. (I think someone on NBR told me you're studying electrical engineering.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meaker Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 After testing, adding in the VRMs does cut the card from dying at 1.2v with a memory over volt but is only required at the utter extreme end of benchmarking. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khenglish Posted March 15, 2015 Share Posted March 15, 2015 After testing, adding in the VRMs does cut the card from dying at 1.2v with a memory over volt but is only required at the utter extreme end of benchmarking.cool, so it is a fet issue and not an inductor one. hmm maybe I should put in stronger high-side fets on my 7970m... vid goes up to 1.225v but it crashes far below that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.