Jump to content

buluunee

Registered User
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    45

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by buluunee

    NVIDIA Kepler VBIOS mods - Overclocking Editions, modified clocks, voltage tweaks

    in General Notebook Discussions

    Posted

    Khenglish: Just because he's got it running that fast doesn't mean it's a good thing. The faster it runs the more memory errors it hits and the slower it ultimately goes.

    buluunee: Try running your memory at 1200ish. At 1250 my card actually scores lower than it does at stock memory clocks, but 1200 helps quite a bit.

    tnx for advise but i know it have been testing at different clocks. Actually i can push my mem +910 where i usually gets bsod and that result is with 830 on mem which is totally stable no flicker no bsod no speed related issue. I knu most of ppl face a problem when they r on high mem oc however mine seems to have very good factory build... however the core max out at 1160mhz for the sake of no bsod

    NVIDIA Kepler VBIOS mods - Overclocking Editions, modified clocks, voltage tweaks

    in General Notebook Discussions

    Posted

    It seems hes being busy recently... im guessing that coz its a time for semester final term exams and assignments in most of the countries. Give him some time he will probably do his genius work some time around. Ps: we r also w8ing for ovted vbios on msi Gtx 675mx 4gb. At the moment stock voltage peaks at 1.0370 and would like to have several versions of ovted vbios to test it to get the decent power with less heat.

    NVIDIA Kepler VBIOS mods - Overclocking Editions, modified clocks, voltage tweaks

    in General Notebook Discussions

    Posted

    Which test are you doing in which program, exactly? "Fire Strike"'s pretty intense; 500 means a /lot/. I really doubt it'd "lie" to me, so to speak.

    If you're only seeing a difference of 50 it makes me wonder if you're doing "Ice Storm" or using 3Dmark 11. 11, on a 680, isn't all that accurate unless you're using the "extreme" preset. ("Performance" works too, sort of, but it can get bottle-necked by the CPU unless you have it at 4 ghz or so) -- The point is, if you're not using it already, go get 3Dmark (Just "3Dmark", that's their newest one), run Fire Strike and base your judgement on that. (You can't pick which tests to run unless you pay for it, but it does give individual results regardless. Scroll down and you should see it.)

    Sort of off-topic but not. Sorta: Basically, 3Dmark 11's "extreme" preset doesn't lie to you. The score is how many frames you rendered, period. Nothing special. "Performance" multiplies by two (this can result in an odd number; remember that it counts partially-rendered frames), and "Entry" multiplies by four. Nope, kay, they do just adjust the difficulty. I think. A "perfect" score, not counting the physics or combined tests, is 7,200 frames. I figure the extra stuff must come from finishing those two faster than you "should" or something. I don't know. The rest of this post is still accurate, go hug it. (See what happens when I stay up an extra four hours?)

    Alone, this isn't a problem. What causes the problem is that 3Dmark 11 has vsync enabled. In other words, if you /can/ render over 60 frames per second, it won't let you. There's basically a hard-coded limit for how well you're allowed to do, /and it does affect your score/. In the "Performance" preset, part of the first three tests usually hits 60. This can cause odd patterns in scores to come up. The reason so many people still use the Performance preset is because it's easy to get a "perfect" score, so to speak. If you hit 9,000, that generally means you can't do any better since you're at 60 FPS all the time in all the tests, and realistically no game is going to push your GPU harder (apart from Crysis and stuff like that, but those are /made/ to drive overclockers batty).

    Even though you can get accurate results using Extreme (since that's definitely not going to hit 60 unless you've got a dual-GPU setup), the fact it's using vsync makes it iffy for me. "3Dmark" (not 11!) doesn't have vsync enabled. If you can pump out more than 60 frames on a certain test, it'll let you and your score will still be accurate. That being said, if you're getting over 1,000 FPS, there's a good chance that your CPU is the bottleneck and it's ability to "feed" the card is becoming a factor; make sure you run a test that suits your card. In general, if you have anything over a 660, you should be doing Fire Strike.

    ...I probably shouldn't be posting when I'm running off of no sleep, but eh. Here goes.

    here i s min 3dmark 1.0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3630QM Processor,Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-1762. btw its higher than stock gtx 680m score and i got that score with throttling coz i am sitting on the stock voltage and higher the core higher the throttling as i examined. and also if your running on MSI machine then throttling causes are mostly related to EC.

    NVIDIA Kepler VBIOS mods - Overclocking Editions, modified clocks, voltage tweaks

    in General Notebook Discussions

    Posted

    buluunee: Throttling does decrease the 3D score. Did a benchmark before and after using slv7's vbios. Without it I throttle a lot when I have +135 set. The difference in the score's pretty big; 300-500 on Fire Strike.

    In your second post, did you say you usually get 1.03 volts? Under what conditions? Is that constant or peak? Mine usually runs at .987, though for split seconds sometimes it goes to 1.012.

    its at peak. and i did benchmark w.o throttle and throttle. it does not influence that lot. around 50 or something very small amount.

    NVIDIA Kepler VBIOS mods - Overclocking Editions, modified clocks, voltage tweaks

    in General Notebook Discussions

    Posted

    i still think thats bit hot coz i have never seen more than 74C in full benchmark with demo and thats with +450 core +830 memory. with mild OC in benchmark it usually sits around 69C. you can expect to see some overheating with games on that OC. most of late 2012 and 2013 games run 10C hotter than benhcmark. and also, i would not recommend you to OC your gpu more than 200 on core and 400 on memory for daily usage. as for me i do not OC my nb for games coz atm its sufficient enough to have fun with the latest games and my temps maxes out 83C on tomb raider 2013 on High setting which gives me very playable 40 fps and i could also push my turbo fan feature to lower my temps untill 65C so i think thats overheating as for your nb

    NVIDIA Kepler VBIOS mods - Overclocking Editions, modified clocks, voltage tweaks

    in General Notebook Discussions

    Posted

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3630QM Processor,Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-1762 score: P6590 3DMarks this is what i get with 675mx +440 core +810mem 1.37V which is stock and max stable point and according to this benchmark my cpu is bottleneck for my score as you can see that my physics score is bit low. anyway to improve it? for my gpu i can hit max +470 on core with little bit shattering or sometimes crash with stock voltage. can i increase the core speed more than this with OVed vbios? like 1.37 to 1.5... is it possible to push it till 1.5 on 180watt brick? tnx for any reply

    NVIDIA Kepler VBIOS mods - Overclocking Editions, modified clocks, voltage tweaks

    in General Notebook Discussions

    Posted

    well there is a pretty big difference :)

    click on the links in my signature to see the differences.....the 680m may cost more, it also has WAY more potential.

    It's like a BMW 3.28i that gets a turbo charger to get BMW M3 power...

    So what happens when the BMW M3 gets a turbo charger :59:

    yah but remember price is a big issue here... gtx 675mx is 15% less powerful than 680m however 50% cheaper than 680m and about in a year both cards will be out of the league so could use that extra 400USD for newer GPU upgrade and i am glad i didnt buy 680m now even tho i was. ^_^

    NVIDIA Kepler VBIOS mods - Overclocking Editions, modified clocks, voltage tweaks

    in General Notebook Discussions

    Posted

    So what are you guys getting on benchmarks with a OCd 675mx? Anyone else out there get that card? I did it because the power for price beats the heck out of the 680m, and with OC I think it gets close to a stock 680m.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3630QM Processor,Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-1762 score: P6545 3DMarks this is what i get with OC atm its max stable OC with msi gtx 675mx and beyond that point i get BSOD due to voltage limit on the vbios also, during OC i get 2c increase than normal temps which is pretty awsome. i will update this score when new driver releases from nvidia. and maybe if there were OVed vbios available. atm my vbios is unlocked with memory and core clock but not with voltage so if i could get my hands on OVed vbios i think i can hit 7k score.

    NVIDIA Kepler VBIOS mods - Overclocking Editions, modified clocks, voltage tweaks

    in General Notebook Discussions

    Posted

    well 450mhz is where it hits the limit on the core which will snow effect. 799mhz on core the also the limit where you ll see some snow effect for gtx 675mx. i can get stable OC for the benchmark at +445mhz on core and +788mhz on mem beyond that point 3dmark just crashes at the 3rd test. however this my latest 3dmark score with 785mhz on mem 430mhz on the core which gives me pretty decent score and low temps on benchmark NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3630QM Processor,Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-1762 score: P6516 3DMarks

    with this score i am holding the first place in gTx 675mx results

Copyright (c) 2023 Tech|Inferno Media. All rights reserved.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

 Accept Cookies  Reject Cookies