Jump to content

Phoenix

Registered User
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Phoenix

  1. Thanks guys, that's what I was thinking as well. For my R1, I'm assuming I can get a 780m card from a Clevo, MSI or other brand and just re-flash the VBIOS with ones provided by @svl7. (thanks in advance for that mate) Does this sound about right? or is there something else I'm missing here. I was looking at some second hand parts on ebay and might pull the trigger on this pretty soon.

    berryracer, I assume your rig is a newer M18. Did the 780m's you have with that come with it or were they an upgrade? How are they working out for 2014 titles (Far Cry 4, Assassins Creed Unity, etc)

    Thanks again,

    My laptop originally came with the Radeon shitfire 8970 which to me were worse both in gaming and when watching my movies using SVP (smooth video project) because of the lack of CUDA so videos never looked as good using DXVA only

    anyway, the Radeon drivers suck so bad and they don't do DPI scaling well. I use a 125% scaling on my 18.4" screen

    Alienware replaced my laptop due to a diff. problem I had with the CPU and gave me this Alienware 18 you see in my sig, it came with the 780M GTX SLI out of the box

    I can play any game I throw at it at max specs.

    For a comparison, I recently got an ASUS G751JY laptop which had a GeForce 980M GTX (single not SLI) and the 780M GTX in SLI`s score were about 5% higher so I think it is pretty amazing that a 2 generation old card even though in SLI, still beats the latest and greatest 980M

    GeForce GTX 980M with 347.25 [W8] [ASUS G751JY] =

    2l8f4ih.jpg

    GeForce GTX 780M SLI (344.75) [W8] [Alienware 18] =

    awc64o.jpg

    • Thumbs Up 1
  2. Cpu-z is stupid. Your memory is just fine.

    The SPD tab is showing the timings (somewhat wrong) that should be programmed into the SPD chip. They do not indicate the frequency/timings the memory is actually running at (that can be seen in memory tab).

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    I see, thanks a lot man I was very worried

    - - - Updated - - -

    Cpu-z is stupid. Your memory is just fine.

    The SPD tab is showing the timings (somewhat wrong) that should be programmed into the SPD chip. They do not indicate the frequency/timings the memory is actually running at (that can be seen in memory tab).

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    I see, thanks a lot man I was very worried

    I just checked with HWinfo and it actually gave the correct reading!

    how the heck can CPU-Z be so stupid! along with SPECCY, and AlienAutopsy! They all reported my RAM running @ 1777 MHz. and alarmed me!

    s1i4nc.jpg

  3. I bought 8x4 Kingston HyperX 1866MHz DDR3 PC3-14900 RAM but it shows as PC3-14200 in CPU-Z and the speed is 1777MHz. instead of 1866 MHz.

    I tried to set the clock speed manually to 1866 in the BIOS overclocking options but it doesn't change anything when I actually boot into Windows.

    Why is it showing my RAM slower than what it should be?

    I am on BIOS A08 if that matters, then I tried flashing back to A05, same result :(

    20zbixh.jpg

  4. I've had nothing but horrible performance both from my WD My Passport 2 TB External Drive and My Book 3TB external HDD. The problem is, when you buy them, they're great with the original firmware, I made a mistake TWICE by upgrading the firmware, then the performance went down from 400 MB/S to 100 MB/s and there is no way in heck for you to downgrade the firmware! their support sucks. If you read the posts on the WD forums you will be shocked by the horror stories. Get Seagate, much more reliable and super fast

  5. Stick to AHCI and NO RAId. I tried RAID on my two 1 TB Samsung 840 EVOs, yeah good benchmarks, but usage wise, you will not notice on bit of a difference, only the added hassle in updating firmware and managing your drive:

    [h=1]Samsung 840 Evo 1TB RAID vs. RAPID Benchmarks[/h]

    So here are benchmarks of my two 1 TB Samsung 840 EVO SSDs, both in RAID 0 and in RAPID. The 4K speeds are horrible in RAID 0

    AS SSD Benchmark with IRST 12.9.0.1001 in RAID 0 (W8.1)

    zui4xu.jpg

    AS SSD Benchmark with IRST 12.8.0.1016 in RAID 0 (W8.1)

    1zzrfiq.jpg

    Not very happy to be honest. those 4K speeds are horrible

    Previous benchmarks with RAPID, 4K is way better:

    AS SSD Benchmark with IRST 12.9.0.1001 (W8.1):

    28lqc0p.jpg

    AS SSD Benchmark with IRST 12.8.0.1016 (W8.1)

    24nibdx.jpg

    ==========================================

    Windows 7 Benchmarks:

    AS SSD Benchmark with Intel Chipset Drivers 9.4.0.1027 (W7) [RAPID]

    21j3k9e.png

    AS SSD Benchmark with IRST 12.0.7.1002 (W7) [RAPID]

    el5zyp.jpg

    • Thumbs Up 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.