Jump to content

Lenovo E520/E420 new 1.26 bios release has updated microcodes


noric

Recommended Posts

There is a new bios version from Lenovo site, bringing updated cpu microcodes.

http://download.lenovo.com/ibmdl/pub/pc/pccbbs/mobiles/8huj17us.exe

From the changelog:

Version 1.26 (ThinkPad Edge E420, E520)

---------------------------------------

[important updates]

Nothing.

[New functions or enhancements]

- Updated the CPU microcode.

[Problem fixes]

- Corrected the help message for enabling the microphone in the BIOS Setup.

Will this bring ivy bridge support? I don't see what other microcode they could have added...


Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a new bios version from Lenovo site, bringing updated cpu microcodes.

http://download.lenovo.com/ibmdl/pub/pc/pccbbs/mobiles/8huj17us.exe

From the changelog:

Will this bring ivy bridge support? I don't see what other microcode they could have added...


E520/E420 is a Sandy Bridge system using a Series-6 chipset and ME 7.x interface firmware. Khenglish speculates in http://forum.techinferno.com/general-notebook-discussions/2091-lets-enable-overclocking-all-6-7-series-laptops.html that if a Series-6 system had ME 8.x firmware applied then it would support an Ivy Bridge CPU. Unfortunately nobody has proven that to be the case. Furthermore it's necessary to unlock the firmware descriptor OR pull the BIOS chip out and reprogram it with a SPI burner to be able to program the ME 8.x firmware.

Is it worth it? Not imho. Sandy Bridge CPUs are only marginally slower than a Ivy Bridge. Does you care for the faster HD4000 iGPU if using an eGPU? I wouldn't. Do you care for the Series-7 integrated USB 3.0? They're the only upgrades going from Sandy to Ivy Bridge. Incidentally my investigation finding, at least comparing a 2560P to a 2570P, that the Sandy Bridge platform has lower idle power consumption. That's presumably due to an unoptimized USB 3.0 implementation in the chipset.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

E520/E420 is a Sandy Bridge system using a Series-6 chipset and ME 7.x interface firmware. Khenglish speculates in http://forum.techinferno.com/general-notebook-discussions/2091-lets-enable-overclocking-all-6-7-series-laptops.html that if a Series-6 system had ME 8.x firmware applied then it would support an Ivy Bridge CPU. Unfortunately nobody has proven that to be the case. Furthermore it's necessary to unlock the firmware descriptor OR pull the BIOS chip out and reprogram it with a SPI burner to be able to program the ME 8.x firmware.

Is it worth it? Not imho. Sandy Bridge CPUs are only marginally slower than a Ivy Bridge. Does you care for the faster HD4000 iGPU if using an eGPU? I wouldn't. Do you care for the Series-7 integrated USB 3.0? They're the only upgrades going from Sandy to Ivy Bridge. Incidentally my investigation finding, at least comparing a 2560P to a 2570P, that the Sandy Bridge platform has lower idle power consumption. That's presumably due to an unoptimized USB 3.0 implementation in the chipset.

Thank you. I know that IB improvements over SB are mostly negligible. However, if the upgrade to IB were possibile out of the box by just flashing this new bios, it would be a nice option for those who are about to upgrade. For example, I have a dual core cpu and plan to plug in a quad core. If this new bios supported IB, I would obviously go for an IB i7.

The point is: I don't see what other microcodes they could have implemented, other than ivy bridge's. SB cpus all share the same microcode, that I'm aware of: both earlier cpus (e.g.: 2720qm) and newer cpus (e.g. 2760qm).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you. I know that IB improvements over SB are mostly negligible. However, if the upgrade to IB were possibile out of the box by just flashing this new bios, it would be a nice option for those who are about to upgrade. For example, I have a dual core cpu and plan to plug in a quad core. If this new bios supported IB, I would obviously go for an IB i7.

The point is: I don't see what other microcodes they could have implemented, other than ivy bridge's. SB cpus all share the same microcode, that I'm aware of: both earlier cpus (e.g.: 2720qm) and newer cpus (e.g. 2760qm).

It would require a ME 7.x -> 8.x firmware upgrade to support Ivy Bridge CPUs and a hack one at that. Intel do not support Intel 3rd gen CPUs on Series-6 chipsets. That means their partners like Lenovo will not either.

I'm still waiting for some brave soul, perhaps a HP 2560P owner, to try to flash ME 8.x firmware (as used on Series-7 chipset) on their system and see what happens. If it boots and CPU has turbo clocks then it would be a success and a IVB CPU test needs to be done next.

Agreed, having SB and IVB CPU upgradability on the Series-6 chipset would give more choice when shopping for a upgrade CPU. SB CPUs are otherwise likely cost more than equivalent IVB parts due to being the only CPU available for Series-6 chipsets. Series-7 can use either IVB or SB.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would require a ME 7.x -> 8.x firmware upgrade to support Ivy Bridge CPUs and a hack one at that. Intel do not support Intel 3rd gen CPUs on Series-6 chipsets. That means their partners like Lenovo will not either.

I'm still waiting for some brave soul, perhaps a HP 2560P owner, to try to flash ME 8.x firmware (as used on Series-7 chipset) on their system and see what happens. If it boots and CPU has turbo clocks then it would be a success and a IVB CPU test needs to be done next.

Agreed, having SB and IVB CPU upgradability on the Series-6 chipset would give more choice when shopping for a upgrade CPU. SB CPUs are otherwise likely cost more than equivalent IVB parts due to being the only CPU available for Series-6 chipsets. Series-7 can use either IVB or SB.

Well, I thought ME firmware were included in the bios. However, if you say that Intel officially doesn't support this, I doubt that Lenovo will. I wonder what microcode they have implemented, by the way...

Thanks for the info, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.