vitale

And you'd be guessing wrong because if that was the case, everyone with the vbios and the latest driver would have the same problem. Additionally, you haven't provided an ounce of proof to support this. If you want to blame the vbios, you need to at least provide some GPU logs, hardware configuration, application used and what clocks you attempted. Otherwise it's completely meaningless and we're not going to go on OCN searching for that information.

He might mean this , although my overclocks actually became more stable when i updated drivers

18th may ManuelG

Technically this is by design. We introduced a change in our overclocking policy where the clock management respects the VBIOS settings. VBIOS's GPCPLL maximum VCO frequency is 2000 MHz(GPC 999MHz) for Fermi that’s why we are capped it at 999MHz. However due to end user demand, we are reverting these changes and implementing the same policy we had pre-R295 drivers. You will see this in our WHQL driver that will be released soon. "

Not sure if this could be a bug with the newest drivers 320.14 or if its a bug with the vbios my card is getting stuck in different clocks like 2d clock mode i think for example i run a game and it shows 574mhz and even when adjusting the gpu clock it still stays on that ? i tried a restart and also closing precision and re-opening it and also checked gpuz it is indeed at 574 mhz ? any ideas nvidia control settings are prefer max performance and single display as well

Edit

Can confirm it is not 320.14 i reinstalled the whql drivers and same issue ? it seems it is switching between 3d and 2d clock mode but is very slow to do so now where as before it was instant any idea what could be causing this i haven't changed anything other than installing the latest drivers which i have now reverted

Just took the leap finally and started using the OC vbios works a treat

I appreciate your time and i enjoy seeing people give back to the community and help others like you have i have put $20 towards your efforts and look forward to seeing what else you have in store for us !

Revised the 'OC edition', the updated files can be found in the first post. I adjusted the fan curve a bit so that it behaves more or less like the original vbios, but allows 100% fan speed.

The older version resulted in a too passive fan curve which lead to higher temps unless the fan got adjusted per software.

So if you ask me it's a good idea to update.

Has the " GTX Titan - 80.10.2C.00.90' - 'OC edition v02' (SC version)" also been updated with this new fan profile if not could you please do so ?

No risk I'd say, as long as you can handle the temps. Default power target was 250W if I remember correctly. The effect of this change is mainly that the card doesn't start to throttle at a certain load. It's great for benching if you ask me, but with the stock voltage it might be too much for long gaming sessions, depending on your cooling. At least that's what people have mentioned in this thread. I'll post an undervolted version soon, some people might find it useful.

I run this vbios for quite a while now, and no issues at all, but I have to say that I never had time for gaming, however I've been benching single card and Tri-SLI with it and pushing the cards to the very max (on air) and no issues at all.

It's not really a long time testing, the Titan is still a very new card, but seeing that the 670 and 680 folks have no problems with such mods I positive that the numbers I set are safe to use provided you can handle the temps.

My buddy Conkers used a 670 with a very similar vbios of mine for several months and all was perfectly fine.

And regarding the modifying... if you look around the forums you'll see that I've been modifying a lot of Kepler vbios, especially mobile cards. I started flashing the Titan the same day I got it, took me a while to get it to work as I intended, but now I've been running this for quite a while and finally am happy with the card

First of thanks for the reply and thanks for taking the time to mod the bios for people who aren't as tech savvy such as myself i have few more questions just to be sure hopefully not to much of a headache to answer

The bios you provide comes with adjustable voltage , my card currently runs at 1.112 voltage at 1159mhz core clock and 3105mhz memory clock assuming i use your bios and set the voltage to 1.112 and the temps don't exceed say 75c-80c max ?(currently sits at 66c @ 73% fanspeed gpu usage 99%) then the card is working within its engineered limits correct ?

For reference i am using evga gtx titan sc

Sorry for all the questions i just don't want to fry a $1300 card and im torn between waiting to see if nvidia fix there broken cards or having to use a custom bios such as yours

Battlefield series has turned into a money grab with eye candy game went down hill after bf2:bc and nothing will compare to 1942 was the first battlefield game i played flying massive maps nothing could beat it

I have a quick question about the power target "Default power target = 350W" im a noob when it comes to this stuff which is why im going to ask apparently the default power target for titan is 300w what i want to know is if i use this bios and its 50w over what sort of risk am i running of cooking my card ? along with disabling boost 2.0 it sounds greats and its what most people want but has svl7 ran any tests to see the effect this has on the card long term etc because i can't understand for the life of me how 1 man can do all this and solve the titan problems and then you have a bunch of guys at nvidia that have taken 6 weeks + with a fix and have yet to release anything something does not seem right either they just don't want the cards fully unlocked or there's more to it than just disabling boost 2.0

Post your ingame settings if your still having issues and i can help you out i played wow for 7 years

I have some spare dota keys as well anyone need 1 add my steam counter_slut (name vitale)