Jump to content
EwinRacing Flash Series Gaming Chairs
Brian

Do you plan to upgrade to a new generation GPU?

Do you plan to upgrade to a new generation GPU?  

106 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Do you plan to purchase new hardware (e.g. desktop video card or notebook w/discrete graphics) that has AMD's newest Polaris or NVIDIA's Pascal GPU?

    • Will get desktop AMD Polaris graphics card ASAP.
    • Will get desktop NVIDIA Pascal graphics card ASAP.
    • Plan to upgrade to AMD Polaris mGPU ASAP.
    • Plan to upgrade to NVIDIA Pascal mGPU ASAP.
    • I'm going to take a wait and see approach based on reviews.
    • I don't plan to upgrade yet.


Recommended Posts

NVIDIA's Pascal is on it's way and should be available sometime in June based on current leaks. One of the first GPUs may be a full GDDR5x GP104 based GeForce 1080 GPU and we will almost assuredly have mobile variants shortly thereafter. AMD hasn't given us nearly as much information on Polaris except their performance/watt demo a few months ago but we're fairly certain it is priming for release as well. 

 

MSI-GTX-1080-GAMING-8G-vs-GTX-980-Reference-900x424.jpg

 

With the new generation of GPUs quickly approaching, do you plan to upgrade to either of them upon release? Why or why not? 

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I picked I will be upgrading ASAP, the truth is I may hold off for the full die Pascal in 2017. My guess is the 1080 will initially be anywhere from 20-30% faster than the current 980 Ti and and the 1080 Ti will take it even further than that. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd time the purchase with the release of a new game. If your current GPU runs your games just fine, it's always best to wait and upgrade when a new AAA game is released (e.g. as many did when Witcher 3 was released). I myself still enjoy the 680M as long as possible but I'm thinking about getting a Pascal-based notebook when my good old x7200 can't keep up with games (at medium settings) anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In all honesty I'm upgrading my Dell Precision M6600 from a fermi Quadro 3000m with a 60% overclock to a Quadro K4000m, which I hope overclocks well with slv7's modded vBIOS.

I don't really see a reason to upgrade beyond that given the 3000m already runs most things at decent settings, 1080p fairly well, excluding stuff like DS3 and Witcher 3, so I'll be more than happy with the cheap, pre-owned K4000m.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a nivida 780 in my desktop pc atm. and it still runs most games with decent Graphics. Right now most of my gaming is spend playing LoL, Guild Wars 2 and CS:GO so its not like I need a big upgrade. But I might consider an upgrade to Nvidia 980 if they fall enough price with the release of the pascal so I can be a little more future proof with release of new games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea. I'll just buy one down the road sometime when games get to the point that I can't run graphics on medium-high with my 970.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

My confidence in AMD and NVIDIA has never been so low. I most likely won't upgrade GPUs from where I am for a good while. I am getting tired of spending huge sums of money on poor quality samples of NVIDIA MXM cards. I voted the last option because most reviews are worthless. I'm not nearly as interested in how GPUs or CPUs perform stock as I am how far they can be pushed with overclocking and what those results look like. For example, 7970M was a real pisser because it had decent stock performance (at the time) and failed miserably at overclocking. The frequency of premature failures was simply the poop-flavored icing on the cake. Excluding that lousy example from AMD, I cannot remember the last time I purchased a CPU or GPU based on stock results because that simply doesn't interest me. Had there been an option " I'm going to take a wait and see approach based on the extreme overclocked benchmark results of enthusiast that I am familiar with and trust." (e.g. @johnksss) I would have selected that option.

Edited by Guest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Mr. Fox said:

Had there been an option " I'm going to take a wait and see approach based on the extreme overclocked benchmark results of enthusiast that I am familiar with and trust." (e.g. @johnksss) I would have selected that option.

 

I don't think that would've quite fit in the question box :) But yeah the marketing is doing the driving for both companies and the NVIDIA Founder's Sucker's Edition charging an extra $100 for a reference card is all too funny yet appalling. Fortunately NVIDIA likely won't need to carry over this new "branding" to the mobile version since they already price gouge for those. AMD meanwhile is busy falling apart internally with RTG led by Raja Koduri leading an internal rebellion and forming possible IP licensing deals with Intel and trying to get Polaris out the door. 

 

From the looks of it, both Pascal and Polaris will be disappointing overclockers with AMD rumored to have troubles clocking up Polaris anywhere near where Pascal starts and it seems Pascal is hard limited to around 1.25v (gets unstable beyond 1.25v) even with a custom vbios and on LN2 the 1080 barely breaks 2400 MHz and ends up slower than LN2 cooled 980 Ti cards. So basically, even under the best circumstances with a modded vbios, we won't likely see 1080s breaking >2.2 GHz stable despite AIB's adding in all those new power phases and 6 pin connectors. 

 

In fact, there's a 1070 review floating around that shows even at 2 GHz, the 1070 doesn't gain much performance and a lower power version will most likely hit notebooks and have similar poor uptake in performance while overclocked. Overall, I'm pretty disappointed by Pascal and I think Polaris will be an even bigger disappointment as it seems AMD has been left miles behind by NVIDIA. AMD aren't even confident enough to invite Hard|OCP to their Macau conference in fear of Kyle calling out their card as weak. 

 

Firestrike

3dmark51uva.jpg
 

The Division
asheslcujk.jpg

 

Ashes of Singularity

divisionbmu1r.jpg
 

If the desktop 1070 is bandwidth limited as it seems in the above graphs, then it is almost a sure bet any mobile variant will face the same limitations with GDDR5. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

@Brian - this is exactly the kind of information people DESERVE to know, because all of the marketing hype is going to mislead them... by design and intent, the marketing information is misleading. The fanboys will piss and moan and call it being picked on for their misinformed buying decisions, but those that actually care about quality and performance will approach the situation in a guarded and cautious manner. Intel and NVIDIA hope that people dive in and start drinking the Kool-Aid for no reason other than it is new and claimed to be good by those selling it. Because AMD has been historically lame, Intel and NVIDIA are trusted far more than they should be. They are not our friends, but they want us to think they are. Those that know better understand that they are viewed as a potential revenue stream, not a customer they need to fight to retain. Monopolies are bad for everyone except those that stand to profit from the absence of competition and accountability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I read all the details for the 1070 and 1080 I thought they were doing really well. I wasn't planning on upgrading for a while anyway due to my 970 still playing most games without any problems, but reading this thread totally cements the decision in my mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Myxomop
      This new Game Ready Driver provides the best day-0 gaming experience for the latest new games supporting NVIDIA DLSS 3 technology including Conqueror’s Blade and Dakar Desert Rally.

      Gaming Technology
       
      Introduces support for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
      Fixed Bugs
       
      Portal RTX hang during resolution/mode change and GFE recording [3894168] [DirectX 12] Shadowplay recordings may appear over exposed when Use HDR is enabled from the Windows display settings. [200742937] AVS4You monochrome video preview [3890225] Players report black/grey screens in Outer Wilds with 522.25 driver [3841593] Lumion Pro 12.3 - Heavy corruption observed on app window.[3784371] Fixed brightness issue on some Notebooks [3765244]  
      Windows 10 & 11
      x64 Desktop
      https://us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/528.02/528.02-desktop-win10-win11-64bit-international-dch-whql.exe
      x64 Notebook
      https://ru.download.nvidia.com/Windows/528.02/528.02-notebook-win10-win11-64bit-international-dch-whql.exe
    • By Brian
      I went with Intel 13900K + RTX 4090 this gen, how about you? 
    • By Yariko
      Hi,
      I have an old Dell Alienware M17R3 (2011 built, “new”A12 Bios). Back in 2014 my GTX580M broke, so I decided to put in a GTX680M, which lasted till recently. Now I’m stuck again with 8 beeps and the LCD not turning on. When I remove the card and switch the laptop on, the LCD at least turns on, so I guess it’s a faulty GTX680M. Now...back then people suggested not to go for a GTX580M due to bad thermal values, but as I’m not really using the Laptop for gaming anymore, wouldn’t a GTX480M possibly be a better alternative that lasts even longer? I heard that GTX700M’s could fit in as well, but people reported non fixable sound issues plus thermal issues. Any ideas?
    • By Henrik9979
      Okay here is what's going. I have a alienware m18x r1 running an amd 8970m, I wanted to upgrade it to crossfire but I could see a 8970m was more expensive than a r9 m290x
      So I decided to buy a r9 m290x and see if I could make it work in my alienware and also run crossfire.
      Even though many shops refused to sell me one because the didn't think it would work in an alienware m18x r1 only in the r2.
       
      Here is the whole process.
       
      19/08/17 23:15
      No post bios showing when booting, so impossible to enter bios menu, but can boot into windows 10 with no problems.
       
      19/08/17 23:20
      Because I haven't deleted the old AMD 8970m the r9 m290x shows as a 8970m with no problems.
       
      19/08/17 23:34
      First performance test was a success. The r9 m290x changed p-state normally. The gpu fan start spinning normally. But because of no thermal paste, the test lasted 20 seconds because the temperature raised fast.
       
      20/08/17 00:00
      Created a backup of the vbios version
      015.032.000.004.044450
       
      20/08/17 00:10
      Flashed a new clevo vbios version 015.032.000.003.044465
      Caused the card to be corrupted and resulted the 8 beep code.
       
      20/08/17 00:35
      Finally managed to flash the back and return the graphics card to its original state.

      20/08/17 00:50
      Flashed a new dell vbios version 015.046.000.014.045579
      No change in behavior
       
      20/08/17 01:07
      After trying multiple vbios with no luck I finally found one.
      Dell vbios Version 015.041.000.000.044966
      Brings back the post bios screen and I can now enter the bios menu through the r9 m290x.
      Note: This vbios reduce the cards performance from 900 mhz to 850 mhz
       
      20/08/17 01:21
      After more testing I found one that is working with no limits.
      Clevo vbios version
      015.036.000.005.044618
      Brings back the post bios screen and I can now enter the bios menu through the r9 m290x.
      This will be the vbios I will keep at the moment.

      20/08/17 01:56
      I completely uninstalled the previous driver and installed the newest driver. The graphics card is recognized as a 8970m but works normal.

      21/08/17 20:15
      I have inserted my old 8970m in the secondary slot and will start testing crossfire.
       
      21/08/17 21:45
      I have found out that the fan for the secondary fan did not spin. The is a cable that have felt out. I will fix it now.

      21/08/17 22:00
      In my try to test crossfire compatibility, I installed the newest AMD driver 17.7.2 but as soon it installed the driver for the secondary card it caused black screen. Only booting the computer in safe mode brings the screen back.

      21/08/17 23:02
      After many frustrating hours I finally managed to get crossfire working with the r9 m290x as the primary card and my old 8970m as the secondary.
      I have flashed the same vbios on both cards so the r9 m290x shows up I device manager as a 8970m.
       
      I first installed AMD driver version 16.2.1
       
      Then installed AMD driver version 16.6.1 in order to play battlefield

      21/08/17 23:20
      First test run in battlefield 1

      21/08/17 23:40
      Battlefield 1 is flickering bad, this can maybe be solved with a new patch or driver.
      Other games I have tried is working perfect with crossfire on.


      Now what I would like to try is somehow force the r9 m290x driver to be installed and see if it will make it possible to run the latest AMD driver without getting a blackscreen.
       
      I have tried to edit the .inf file like you would do with nvidia but no luck.
      I have also tried to figure out how to edit the device id in the vbios, but I find it too complex.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.