Jump to content
EwinRacing Flash Series Gaming Chairs
Brian

[BENCHMARKS] The OFFICIAL Thread

Recommended Posts

Guest
58 minutes ago, Papusan said:

Cinebench R15 - 1068 cb score from the BGA-KILLER  :whistle: Up from 1065 cb:Banane16:
http://hwbot.org/submission/3344932_papusan_cinebench___r15_core_i7_6700k_1068_cb?recalculate=true

1717530.jpg

 

3DM11 - 18889P

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11653576

1714371.jpg

Nice score, Brother @Papusan. I wonder if your newer version of Windows 10 or the newer NVIDIA driver is holding you back a little bit? I was running an older version of Windows 10 and an older driver in this comparison. If you use the driver I used in this run does the graphics performance improve? You should be able to beat my high score with your more efficient CPU sample. Your physics and combined score are higher, so it almost has to be the driver or newer version of Windows 10 causing lower graphics performance. I doubt it is the 17MHz difference in GPU core clock, but I suppose that it could be.

 

http://www.3dmark.com/compare/3dm11/11440376/3dm11/11653576#

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, is 13400 Firestrike score good for gtx 980 desktop in p870?

 

I wonder how much more score would be improvement with Prema bios. Because now when card reaches 79c it downclocks with PerfCap Reason Thrm.

Firestrike.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, wersuss said:

Hi, is 13400 Firestrike score good for gtx 980 desktop in p870?

Depends on how high your overclock is. We need to know your overclocking settings on gpu/cpu. Also different drivers can make a difference.

18 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

Nice score, Brother @Papusan. I wonder if your newer version of Windows 10 or the newer NVIDIA driver is holding you back a little bit? I was running an older version of Windows 10 and an older driver in this comparison. If you use the driver I used in this run does the graphics performance improve? You should be able to beat my high score with your more efficient CPU sample. Your physics and combined score are higher, so it almost has to be the driver or newer version of Windows 10 causing lower graphics performance. I doubt it is the 17MHz difference in GPU core clock, but I suppose that it could be.

 

http://www.3dmark.com/compare/3dm11/11440376/3dm11/11653576#

Thanks bro  @Mr. Fox  Most likely a combination of drivers, Crippled Windows version and a notch lower Oc on graphics. M$ is known to destroy everything now as well Nvidia dont offer better performance with newer drivers, LOL

 As well your graphics card might be more efficient (you need most likely lower voltage duo higher Asic score). Last but not least, I have slower ram(better ram help huge in 3DM11). 

 I think I need to replace the paste and thermal pads before tougher bench... Have not done this yet. What thickness should be on pads on the graphics card? Thought of these 14 W / mK Fujipoly / Alphacool pads. They are softer than those at 17 W / mK. Your opinion on this? I think also to replace the pads on the processor heatsink. I have ordered better fans for my U3. And my wife use the fireplace more and more now:upset:

Edited by Papusan
  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My new memory latency score. 47.6 ns!

Timings passed MemTest86 for 4 full runs.

 

cachemem5.png

  • Thumbs Up 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/26/2016 at 2:01 AM, coolane said:

My new memory latency score. 47.6 ns!

Timings passed MemTest86 for 4 full runs.

 

cachemem5.png

That's pretty great! Let us know if you ever manage T1 instead of T2 =D

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, D2ultima said:

That's pretty great! Let us know if you ever manage T1 instead of T2 =D

Thanks. I have been wanted to set it to T1/CR1 for so long, but the BIOS/NVRAM won't save my change after reboot.

I also tried to set it through Khenglish's UEFI method, but after reboot the value was reset back to T2.

Not sure is it because of the mother board limitation or my memory sticks.

 

Using UEFI variables, I could set voltage over 1.20v, but I still can't boot my sticks to 3100 or 3192 MHz with 1.30 or 1.35v.

Last time I used CR1 was in my sold gt72s barebone, I could clock the 4x8G 2133 (normal green kingston) to [email protected]

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Just got the new beast and breaking it in with some stock GPU benchmarks. I'm still testing to see what voltage the new 6700K likes. So far, seems to need less voltage than the other two I had. I have a baby-girl 4.3GHz CPU OC on these run, but GPUs are totally stock.

 

I gotta say, I just LOVE these fans. They're awesome. I don't care if they're loud. Temps are in the upper 60's and low 70's on both GPUs with max fans.

 

http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/5534875

 

AVQ5uRg.jpg

 

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11711390

 

q0Fqlz3.jpg

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

Just got the new beast and breaking it in with some stock GPU benchmarks. I'm still testing to see what voltage the new 6700K likes. So far, seems to need less voltage than the other two I had. I have a baby-girl 4.3GHz CPU OC on these run, but GPUs are totally stock.

 

I gotta say, I just LOVE these fans. They're awesome. I don't care if they're loud. Temps are in the upper 60's and low 70's on both GPUs with max fans.

 

http://www.3dmark.com/3dmv/5534875

 

AVQ5uRg.jpg

 

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11711390

 

q0Fqlz3.jpg

 

 

 

Dear Friend @Mr. Fox  many of us just waiting for you, @Prema and other Seniors to show us what this laptop can do with stable heat and performance. Take your time, for me and all my close friends just waiting for the results. I'm buying many used laptops for me and for my friends in my location just to fulfill our needs for now, hope that we can see the results soon.

Wish you all the best.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

P150EM dGPU output progress continues! Now have image on boot! P0 now works! and that means... benchmarks!

 

Unfortunately this weird vBIOS I am using made me drop ~800MHz on memory clocks. The default memory clocks on this vBIOS is 6.6ghz, which is unstable, and in P0 I can only raise, not lower memory clocks. 3dm11 was the only major benchmark the unstable memory was able to complete. Also this score below is only at 4.2ghz cpu.

 

This is a 1.3V vBIOS as well. I think I am getting the performance loss of vBIOS 1.1V+, so if this were a 1.2V vBIOS I think I would score a few hundred points better. That 6.6ghz memory is also hurting a lot.

 

1550/6600 3dm11:

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11717053

 

I will soon have some optimus vs direct output performance comparisons. I will be running P1 so I can drop memory clocks to the stable range.

Edited by Khenglish
  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's some optimus vs direct performance comparisons. Unfortunately testing is very limited, as optimus will cap full screen fps to the refresh rate for me on win10. But here's some uncapped tests at 1228/5610, which is as high as P1 lets me go. I did not want to deal with the instability of testing P0.

 

time spy:

3483 dedicated

3482 optimus

 

windowed heaven 4.0 (windowed 1080P):

1415 dedicated

1402 optimus

 

fs ultra:

2801, 2778 dedicated

2726, 2588 optimus

 

So from this short testing time spy lost zero performance with optimus, heaven lost an acceptable 1%, but firestrike ultra was much slower. There is variation between tests in fsu, but up to 8% slower is a very significant performance drop.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
Little by little. Really fighting this crappy stock Clevo BIOS... a LOT.
 
kZNRyof.png
 
pFWjTqc.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
13 hours ago, Khenglish said:

 

So you ran 2076 core? I'm surprised it's still around 1k lower than a modded 980m.

 

Nope, that was set to:

 

Core: 1871Mhz

vRAM: 2350MHz

 

And throttled like no tomorrow with it's stock vBIOS...just a small test to compare apples with apples before hunting the green falcon...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By OnaStack100
      I have a p150sm which has a seemingly dead 780m due to a perpetual error 43 which came after a big BSOD about 6 months ago. I upgraded the laptop to a 980m and modded the inf files. The upgrade was perfectly fine for a week. One day, i left the laptop and something related to sleep or power may have caused the laptop to shut off. Since then, the laptop with the 980m won't boot. I tried many things like resetting cmos, taking out the hardware and putting it back in, and resetting bios, and buying a 230W adapter. Nothing worked. The laptop works fine with the old dead 780m in there, but now when the 980m is in there, holding the power button generates a green light flash and then the power LED goes back to orange. No sounds, maybe one tick, and that's it. What is left to try?
    • By DragonRai
      After the most recent Windows 10 update, my Clevo Control Centre has stopped working properly. When I try to change the fan speed nothing happens and this is causing my laptop to overheat when playing certain games. This has happened before but using malware bytes seemed to work; that was a free trial so I no longer have access to this. 
      Please can someone help? I'm at my wits end with this.
       
    • By Yomaster
      Hello, 
       
      some of my computer specs are as follows: 
      CPU: I9-9900k
      GPU: RTX 2070
      memory: 32 GB (forget the manufacturer/ clocks)
      Dsanke bios mod
       
       
       I recently bought a 1440p screen that is 120hz capable, but it does not allow me to select the 120hz option. I have checked numerous places and all of the websites say that this screen is 120hz enabled. I have the dsanke bios mod on my computer. I see people being able to use this screen's 120hz functionality, but I can't get it to work. Any suggestions? If you need any additional information about my laptop, I will be happy to provide info.
       
    • By Qvixot
      Hello everyone! First of all sorry if this isn't the correct forum to post this.
      I bought a laptop few days ago. The laptop is Sager P150EM.
      Cpu:i7 3610qm 
      Gpu: amd hd 7970m
      Ram: 8gb
      Os: windows 8.1 pro
      So my problem is that everytime i install the amd driver after the intel driver my laptop freezes or gets a bsod or something that stops it from working. Any help would be appreciated. I saw somewhere something about vbios does this matter anywhere?
    • By Radstark
      Title sums it up.
       
      TL;DR: we have a Clevo that runs a desktop CPU, one with those huge 82 Wh batteries. We remove the GPU and let it use the CPU's integrated graphics. How much time for the battery to go from 100 to 0? Is it comparable to an ultrabook's?
       
      I'm theorizing a mobile set with a static eGPU and an upgradable CPU. Given a hypothetical user that needs fast processing on the go and long battery life while retaining very high degrees of mobility, but at home wants a powerful machine to run most games, I guess that would be their best bet. It would surely be more convenient to keep everything in the same disk. And even though the thing would be quite heavy to carry around, changing CPU would be more cost-efficient than changing an entire laptop. (Not sure if I'm right here, and also I'm not sure whether the motherboard in a Clevo would be replaceable when the new CPU needs a different socket, which is another reason why I'm asking here.)
       
      If my above guesses aren't correct, then an ultrabook with Thunderbolt and without a dedicated GPU would be a better choice. If they are, then we would be carrying more weight in exchange of a more cost-efficient setup, which I think would be a fair tradeoff.
       
      Also I am aware of the heating problems that these laptops suffer from, at least compared to a desktop setup. Would they be solved by moving the GPU out of the chassis, and instead plugging it with an eGPU dock via Thunderbolt port?
       
      What do you think? Is it doable? If not, why?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.