Jump to content
EwinRacing Flash Series Gaming Chairs
Brian

680M vs 7970M - Discussion on how to benchmark them.

Recommended Posts

So after reading endless discussions on another forum with respect to the 7970M and 680M and which is truly the better buy, I wrote the following response:

With respect to benchmarks, especially games, there needs to be a more comprehensive system of testing and scoring. For example, static benchmarks like 3dmark 11/vantage etc should be weighed much less than video games (which they typically are). However, even among games, SP games should have much less weight than popular AAA MP titles which hold 100s of hours of replay.

For example, if a gamer finishes an 8 hr SP game, even if its an awesome DX 11 title, they likely won't go back to it or at the most once or twice unless it has a huge modding community behind it. So if nVidia 680M gets 55 fps @ 1080p with ultra settings and AMD 7970M gets 70 fps @1080p, the fact that it is a SP game should weigh into giving it a score on a performance scale.

On the other hand, if a game like BF3 with settings on ultra @ 1080p (which even stresses high end desktop cards) gets 60 fps with 680M on a heavy MP level (multiple runs of FRAPs should be run for accuracy) vs 45 fps on 7970M, then there should be more weight placed on a benchmark like this since it has a large community of players replaying the same title daily vs a SP game. This can extend to other MP titles as well but this is just one example.

So before arguing about benchmarks take this into consideration and then decide which brand really provides the best performance and value for gaming. Of course there is always feature support, 3rd party development support and drivers that also make a huge impact. Most people here just simplify it to overall benchmark % + cost and that is quite misleading.

This has been on my mind for quite sometime and once we rev up T|I reviews again in the future (we will likely have to hire full-time writers since admins are too busy), I plan to implement a scoring system similar to what I described above. I'd like to hear what our members think of my proposal as well as your own suggestions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Benchmarks like 3DMark11/Vantage are ok to get a rough feeling how a card performs in comparison to other cards, but that's about it. If you recall few years ago EVERYONE was asking for each card "How well does it run WoW?". It was and still is a not well optimized game (shadows ftl), so you could say "Oh but it's not card's fault it's not running perfect. Try something like Crysis". The thing is, so many more people played it instead of Crysis -- it doesn't matter !

I imagine right now for each new card, people are most likely be wondering how well it runs Diablo3, Guild Wars2 and such. Maybe it would be cool to see Intel HD4000 vs AMD Trinity comparisons for Diablo3 as those cards are going to be available on a lot (or all) new laptops and the integrated cards seem to have reached a point where you can use them play something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The importance of games is up to the user to decide.

Post unbiased as possible numbers and that's the best you can do.

A scoring system is too simplistic to implement.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think a weighted scoring system would be very accurate given that some games are more or less optimized for a specific vendor ie nVidia and I agree with @unreal25 that not everybody has the same preference on games (SP vs MP).

I agree with @Meaker that synthetic benchmarks provide unbiased results. Though that's not the whole picture, so I would like to see a list with games that score better with nVidia cards and a separate list of games that favor AMD and let the reader decide given his gaming preferences to choose among those two companies.

A unified scoring system seems hard (what criteria will be used for the weight of each title) to implement and I doubt it will be widely accepted.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not say sythetics were the answer. Though they make comparisons easier.

Just a list of games and differences. A conclusion based on the average percentage is not even that accurate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The importance of games is up to the user to decide.

Post unbiased as possible numbers and that's the best you can do.

A scoring system is too simplistic to implement.

I don't think a weighted scoring system would be very accurate given that some games are more or less optimized for a specific vendor ie nVidia and I agree with @unreal25 that not everybody has the same preference on games (SP vs MP).

I agree with @Meaker that synthetic benchmarks provide unbiased results. Though that's not the whole picture, so I would like to see a list with games that score better with nVidia cards and a separate list of games that favor AMD and let the reader decide given his gaming preferences to choose among those two companies.

A unified scoring system seems hard (what criteria will be used for the weight of each title) to implement and I doubt it will be widely accepted.

Its easy to decide which games deserve more importance, those that are labeled AAA by the industry and have high replay value. It doesn't take rocket science to determine that and it gives better insight into which vendor optimizes best for the most popular titles. Both AMD and nVidia heavily optimize their drivers for synthetic benchmarks to the point that they are completely useless and do not represent actual gaming performance at all. They are just for number chasing and stress testing a system. Using popular MP titles is also easily testable with reliable results, we've done it in our reviews.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think 680M is a little faster than 7970m but it's double price. So the 7970m is the best choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think 680M is a little faster than 7970m but it's double price. So the 7970m is the best choice.

Its definitely not double the price. Maybe $150-$200 premium over the 7970M but that's about it. As for it being a little faster, I guess we'll know soon enough when I test my 680M vs 7970M in an M18x-R1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think 680M is a little faster than 7970m but it's double price. So the 7970m is the best choice.

well, both green and red are doing great this time, as for performance/price Amd sure is the best but for enthusiasts user who want more power the 680m will be the best choice available now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

running the extreme version of vantage and 3dmark11 will give you a pretty good feel of the cards potential (and that would be the extreme preset and not performance). add on top of that for gpu scores when using extreme cpus and high over clocks.

and to be more to the point, quite using the points system and start using the actual fps it shows when finished.

example:

meaker lost to brian by 16 points on gpu? in reality...that's not a lost because the fps is dead even when you go back and look (speculating because i didn't go back and look yet). those fps translate in to gaming fps numbers. (planned gaming bench mark run) when doing mp, it will never be the same...because it's not just having the fastest setup on the planet to play...you also need the most stable connection...or in modern warfare 3 (mp) you need to be the guy in the middle, not the 4 bar or the 1 bar connection and you can still win using a budget notebook. might not look the best but they can sure up the fps by running some super low resolution.

so do an extreme run of vantage and a extreme run of your favorite game and see if it really is "out dated"

metro2033 would fit pretty good in there....so would gta4

no matter how one tries to come up with a system, there will always be people to complain about it. no matter how universal it may be.... so all you can do is grab some titles and let the masses make up their minds in the end....

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
here is an example: 3DMARK11
# USER VER CARD LINK SCORE GPU PHYSX COMBINED GT1 FPS GT2 FPS GT3 FPS GT4 FPS CLOCKS
1 Riri-Fifi R2 HD7970M LINK P12117 13668 9682 8222 55.91 65.00 86.37 44.52 1055/1550
2 Grimy1 R2 HD7970M LINK P11883 12615 10874 9172 51.52 60.19 79.48 41.11 950/1470
3 Speedy Gonzales R2 HD7970M LINK P11868 13423 9404 8046 55.73 63.91 84.61 43.24 CLOCKS
4 PimpFinger R2 HD7970M LINK P11565 12859 9522 8074 51.35 60.63 83.22 42.44 1000/1500
5 Mr Fox R1 HD7970M LINK P11563 12676 9704 8292 52.30 61.11 79.79 4.73 1000/1400
6 DumbDumb R1 HD7970M LINK P11451 12161 10444 8859 950/1350
7 Sketch R1 HD7970M LINK P11413 12375 9945 8383 51.92 58.73 77.56 39.74 950/1350
8 Slowbot R2 GTX680M LINK 10002 11130 8877 6373 719/1900
9 Johnksss R1 GTX580M LINK P8858 8938 10861 6597 42.58 42.97 54.40 26.47 890/850
10 5150Joker R1 GTX680M/1 LINK P8745 9033 8733 7073 43.00 42.12 55.48 27.16 1132/1275

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Henrik9979
      Okay here is what's going. I have a alienware m18x r1 running an amd 8970m, I wanted to upgrade it to crossfire but I could see a 8970m was more expensive than a r9 m290x
      So I decided to buy a r9 m290x and see if I could make it work in my alienware and also run crossfire.
      Even though many shops refused to sell me one because the didn't think it would work in an alienware m18x r1 only in the r2.
       
      Here is the whole process.
       
      19/08/17 23:15
      No post bios showing when booting, so impossible to enter bios menu, but can boot into windows 10 with no problems.
       
      19/08/17 23:20
      Because I haven't deleted the old AMD 8970m the r9 m290x shows as a 8970m with no problems.
       
      19/08/17 23:34
      First performance test was a success. The r9 m290x changed p-state normally. The gpu fan start spinning normally. But because of no thermal paste, the test lasted 20 seconds because the temperature raised fast.
       
      20/08/17 00:00
      Created a backup of the vbios version
      015.032.000.004.044450
       
      20/08/17 00:10
      Flashed a new clevo vbios version 015.032.000.003.044465
      Caused the card to be corrupted and resulted the 8 beep code.
       
      20/08/17 00:35
      Finally managed to flash the back and return the graphics card to its original state.

      20/08/17 00:50
      Flashed a new dell vbios version 015.046.000.014.045579
      No change in behavior
       
      20/08/17 01:07
      After trying multiple vbios with no luck I finally found one.
      Dell vbios Version 015.041.000.000.044966
      Brings back the post bios screen and I can now enter the bios menu through the r9 m290x.
      Note: This vbios reduce the cards performance from 900 mhz to 850 mhz
       
      20/08/17 01:21
      After more testing I found one that is working with no limits.
      Clevo vbios version
      015.036.000.005.044618
      Brings back the post bios screen and I can now enter the bios menu through the r9 m290x.
      This will be the vbios I will keep at the moment.

      20/08/17 01:56
      I completely uninstalled the previous driver and installed the newest driver. The graphics card is recognized as a 8970m but works normal.

      21/08/17 20:15
      I have inserted my old 8970m in the secondary slot and will start testing crossfire.
       
      21/08/17 21:45
      I have found out that the fan for the secondary fan did not spin. The is a cable that have felt out. I will fix it now.

      21/08/17 22:00
      In my try to test crossfire compatibility, I installed the newest AMD driver 17.7.2 but as soon it installed the driver for the secondary card it caused black screen. Only booting the computer in safe mode brings the screen back.

      21/08/17 23:02
      After many frustrating hours I finally managed to get crossfire working with the r9 m290x as the primary card and my old 8970m as the secondary.
      I have flashed the same vbios on both cards so the r9 m290x shows up I device manager as a 8970m.
       
      I first installed AMD driver version 16.2.1
       
      Then installed AMD driver version 16.6.1 in order to play battlefield

      21/08/17 23:20
      First test run in battlefield 1

      21/08/17 23:40
      Battlefield 1 is flickering bad, this can maybe be solved with a new patch or driver.
      Other games I have tried is working perfect with crossfire on.


      Now what I would like to try is somehow force the r9 m290x driver to be installed and see if it will make it possible to run the latest AMD driver without getting a blackscreen.
       
      I have tried to edit the .inf file like you would do with nvidia but no luck.
      I have also tried to figure out how to edit the device id in the vbios, but I find it too complex.
    • By Noxco
      Hello to all can you help me change the graphics card?
      Alienware m17x r4
       i7 3610qm
      quadro k4100m
      display 120hz 3d
      bios a15
      trying to install 980m but not getting 5 or 8 beeps removed the battery and reset the bios. disabled legacy and secure boot in settings windows 10 gpt uefi
      help how to be?
    • By -GP
      I got a msi ge60 2pf Apache pro & its specs :
       
      Processor-i7 4710MQ
      Ram-16GB 
      VGA- GTX 860M 2GB Maxwell 
       
      Could anyone tell me the best overclock that I could use on this GPU?
      Please keep in mind that the voltage cannot be changed as this is a laptop
       
      Thank you
    • By ReverseEffect
      3dMark11 Performance Preset Benchmark: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11262792
       
      Required items:
      1.) Lenovo u310 (I have a Core i3 - Ivy Bridge, 8GB RAM)
      2.) 65CN99WW unwhitelisted.
      3.) eGPU (I used a EVGA GTX 750 Ti from another computer I had).
      4.) EXP GDC mPCIe Edition adapter (got from eBay - banggood seller).
      5.) ATX power supply (I used a 600W PSU from another computer I had).
      6.) USB wireless.
      7.) External monitor, keyboard, and mouse.
       
      Steps:
      1.) Obtain and install a unwhitelisted BIOS. If you are unable to obtain a unwhitelist BIOS, I think it might be possible to bypass it with Tech Inferno Fan's Setup 1.x (may need confirmation as I haven't used it myself yet.)
      2.) Shutdown computer and remove all USB devices, ethernet cables, power cables, card reader cards.
      3.) Remove mPCIe wireless card and detach antennas.
       
       
      4.) Attach EXP GDC external mPCIe cable to the former wireless slot and screw down.
       
       
      5.) Attach HDMI end of the mPCIe cable adapter to the EXP GDC device.
       
       
      6.) Attach graphics card to the EXP GDC device (I moved my laptop off the desk and onto the side shelf to make room on the desk for the monitor/keyboard/mouse).
       
       
      7.) Using the power cable adapters that came with the EXP GDC device, I hooked in my ATX power supply's 20 pin and CPU 4 pin cables. Then hooked the other end (8 pin) into the EXP GDC device. My EVGA 750 Ti also required that I use an additional PCIe power cable (6 pin) in the top of the card.
       
       
       
       
       
      8.) Then I attached my misc devices (HDMI monitor, USB keyboard/mouse/wireless adapter), and hooked in my PSU and powered it on (below is image of final product, also moved HDMI cable out of the way).
       

       
      9.) Power on your computer and let it install the standard VGA drivers and then install your drivers (I didn't have to go in the BIOS for any graphics settings, which it doesn't have anyways, nor did I have to disable iGPU in Device Manager before the card was added).
       
      Extra Info:
      I found that most games will play on med settings with about 45 FPS with this particular card.
      BDO: Upscale on - Anti Aliasing on - SSAO off - med settings.
      Skyrim: Med-High settings.
      Fallout 4: Med settings.
       
      (EDIT 5/19/2016) > Images added.
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.