leocanela Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Hi, guys! Currently, my dream setup would be the 2016 thunderbolt 3 Macbook pros + an eGPU I started this topic on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/5a4hv7/can_someone_please_connect_a_razer_core_with_the/ and another user tested the Razer Core with the new Macbook pro, it didn't work even after a few fixes: https://www.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/5a6z8s/my_experience_with_the_new_13_mbp_and_the_razer/ Have anyone around here got the 2016 MBP and an eGPU working together already? Would you help troubleshoot Razer Core problems with the new MBP? Thanks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euqlaog Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Open up Terminal, and provide the output of the following command: system_profiler SPThunderboltDataType | sed -e '/Port (Upstream)/,/Cable/!d' No 40 Gb/s string, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakebanana Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 That's right - no 40Gb/s string: $ system_profiler SPThunderboltDataType Thunderbolt: Thunderbolt Bus: Vendor Name: Apple Inc. Device Name: MacBook Pro UID: 0x0001493688391000 Route String: 0 Firmware Version: 10.8 Domain UUID: BD1095C8-4F85-6F58-8501-4CF402D77BC8 Port: Status: No device connected Link Status: 0x7 Speed: Up to 20 Gb/s x1 Current Link Width: 0x1 Receptacle: 1 Link Controller Firmware Version: 0.15.0 Port: Status: Device connected Link Status: 0x2 Speed: Up to 20 Gb/s x1 Current Link Width: 0x1 Receptacle: 18 Link Controller Firmware Version: 0.15.0 Core - Unsupported: Vendor Name: Razer Device Name: Core - Unsupported Vendor ID: 0x127 Device ID: 0x215 Device Revision: 0x1 UID: 0x80864F4090116110 Route String: 3 Firmware Version: 16.16 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leocanela Posted October 31, 2016 Author Share Posted October 31, 2016 Any workarounds? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euqlaog Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 There is something really wrong in Thunderbolt firmware handshake. Passive TB3 cables provide transfer data up to 20Gb/s. Would be intriguing to see if the speed is shown as 20Gb/s x2 with the Belkin 40Gb/s cable, when the TB3 device is correctly detected. It should work: http://forums.macrumors.com/threads/base-13-macbook-pro-benchmarks-and-egpu.2010461/#post-23825958 My script is discontinued and may provide only a partial support with newer AMD cards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tech Inferno Fan Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 21 minutes ago, fakebanana said: That's right - no 40Gb/s string: Is this a 13" with 4 TB ports? If so, it only supports full TB3 performance on the two lefthand ports. From http://www.macrumors.com/2016/10/28/macbook-pro-tb3-reduced-pci-express-bandwidth/ Quote Late-2016 MacBook Pro models vary slightly in the data speeds they provide to each Thunderbolt 3 port. MacBook Pro (15-inch, Late 2016) delivers full Thunderbolt 3 performance on all four ports. MacBook Pro (13-inch, Late 2016, Four Thunderbolt 3 Ports) supports Thunderbolt 3 at full performance using the two left-hand ports. The two right-hand ports deliver Thunderbolt 3 functionality, but have reduced PCI Express bandwidth. MacBook Pro (13-inch, Late 2016, Two Thunderbolt 3 Ports) delivers full Thunderbolt 3 performance on both ports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakebanana Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 This is a 13" with 2 TB ports. It's supposed to have full Thunderbolt 3 performance on both ports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euqlaog Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 2 hours ago, fakebanana said: This is a 13" with 2 TB ports. It's supposed to have full Thunderbolt 3 performance on both ports. The picture explains it: 20Gb/s x2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tech Inferno Fan Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 27 minutes ago, goalque said: The picture explains it: 20Gb/s x2. @goalque, where did you find that picture? That shows 2x20Gbps 'physical' channels. The original TB1 was marketted as 20Gbs 'logical' channels, being the cumulative bandwidth across two channels. TB2 allow aggregation of those two channels to form a single TB2 20Gbps channel. However, TB2's x4 2.0 electrical link limited it to 16Gbps for PCIe traffic. If indeed TB3 doesn't allow port aggregation then we only have 20Gbps performance. That being x4 3.0 (32Gbps) limited to 20Gbps down the TB3 channel. That would then only be 25% more bandwidth than TB2. Hardly worth it if true. The easiest way to find out for sure what the real TB3 bandwith is, is for a TB3 eGPU equipped owner to run CUDA-Z and report their host-to-device results, comparing to the chart at https://www.techinferno.com/index.php?/forums/topic/10581-6th-gen-i-core-has-gen3-8gbps-southbridge-pcie-ports/ The other important point is whether active or passive copper TB3 cables are being used, offering 20Gbps and 40Gbps bandwidth respectively. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euqlaog Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 2 hours ago, Tech Inferno Fan said: @goalque, where did you find that picture? That shows 2x20Gbps 'physical' channels. https://m.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/5a6z8s/my_experience_with_the_new_13_mbp_and_the_razer/?utm_source=mweb_redirect&compact=true https://thunderbolttechnology.net/sites/default/files/Thunderbolt3_TechBrief_FINAL.pdf It confirmed my suspicions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tech Inferno Fan Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 1 hour ago, goalque said: https://thunderbolttechnology.net/sites/default/files/Thunderbolt3_TechBrief_FINAL.pdf Thank you. Here we see the important info: Quote A Thunderbolt 3 port supports up to the following: • Each connector must be provided with at least the equivalent of two lanes of PCI Express Gen 3 data • Each connector must be provided at least one full DisplayPort 1.2a (four lane) interface Starting with Intel systems based on the 100 Series chipset, Thunderbolt 3 is delivered via a series of discrete silicon devices that have varying capabilities. The dual port sku supports two Thunderbolt 3 connectors, and takes 4 lanes of PCI Express Gen 3 as an input, and 2 full (four lane) links of DisplayPort 1.2a. The single port sku supports a single Thunderbolt 3 connector. In general, if a system has a single Thunderbolt 3 port, the connectivity behind that port could be as high as four lanes of PCI Express Gen 3 with dual DisplayPort links. It could also be as little as two lanes of PCI Express Gen 3, with a single DisplayPort link. In each case, the Thunderbolt interface itself doesn’t change, it is still 40 Gbps; however, the underlying source data and display may be more limited. ... As a reminder, four lanes of PCI Express Gen 3 operate at (4 x 8 Gbps) 32 Gbps roughly. Thunderbolt 3 uses PCIe x4 gen 3 data rate with 128kB header sizes. For a single Thunderbolt chip with two ports, the x4 PCIe interface data rate is shared across the ports .. and fakebanana is seeing this exact sharing of bandwidth across the two ports: 10 hours ago, fakebanana said: $ system_profiler SPThunderboltDataType Thunderbolt: Thunderbolt Bus: Vendor Name: Apple Inc. Device Name: MacBook Pro UID: 0x0001493688391000 Route String: 0 Firmware Version: 10.8 Domain UUID: BD1095C8-4F85-6F58-8501-4CF402D77BC8 Port: Status: No device connected Link Status: 0x7 Speed: Up to 20 Gb/s x1 Current Link Width: 0x1 Receptacle: 1 Link Controller Firmware Version: 0.15.0 Port: Status: Device connected Link Status: 0x2 Speed: Up to 20 Gb/s x1 Current Link Width: 0x1 Receptacle: 18 Link Controller Firmware Version: 0.15.0 Yep, two ports with dedicated 20Gbps each. If those two cannot be aggregated to one 40Gbps port (PCIe @32Gbps), then TB3 is yet another dud like TB1 was. If Intel follows with the TB1-TB2 model, then TB4 will give us 32Gbps. Intel and their tick-tock NGFF.M2 like @bloodhawk is using does give him 32Gbps (x4 3.0), confirmed with CUDA-Z host-to-device results. This further explains why the NGFF.M2 results were noticable faster than TB3; the latter of which we thought was due to TB3 latency but is now looking to be due to significantly narrower 20Gbps bandwidth. REF: https://www.techinferno.com/index.php?/forums/topic/10579-17-clevo-p870dm-g-gtx108032gbps-ngffm2-pe4c-v41-win10-bloodhawk/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morv Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 So to summarize, even if there is as little as only one Thunderbolt 3 port it is not guaranteed that it is delivering the full speed of 40 Gbps? Basically, to the existing confusion about USB-C type connectors(does it deliver DP, TB and/or USB 3.1 Gen2 etc.) for usual customers, there's now an additional confusion about the speed of the Thunderbolt 3 port(s) which simply can't be recognized from the outside before purchase? You'd have to get a look on either the board to check for the chips or have a running system to check for the hardware. This is, at this point, one screwed up hell of a connector. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakebanana Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 (edited) Here are the results of CUDA-Z running on my Spectre x360 connected to my Razer Core. It also has two TB3 ports. Host-to-device is running at around 2200 MiB/s (more than TB2, less than NGFF.M2 ). I'm currently using the short passive cable (supposedly rated to 40Gb/s) that came with the core, but I ordered an active cable that I should get in for testing tomorrow night. Edited October 31, 2016 by fakebanana 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theitsage Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 (edited) 23 hours ago, goalque said: Open up Terminal, and provide the output of the following command: system_profiler SPThunderboltDataType | sed -e '/Port (Upstream)/,/Cable/!d' No 40 Gb/s string, right? I can also confirm the two USB-C ports on the base Late 2016 MBP show 20 Gbps. I've tried my RX 470 eGPU which has been working great with an 11" MBA and 17" MBP. Unfortunately there's no Acceleration or Metal Support when connected to TB3 MBP. All the supporting kexts loaded and external monitor work through the eGPU though. Any ideas? Edited October 31, 2016 by theitsage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euqlaog Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 2 hours ago, theitsage said: I can also confirm the two USB-C ports on the base Late 2016 MBP show 20 Gbps. I've tried my RX 470 eGPU which has been working great with an 11" MBA and 17" MBP. Unfortunately there's no Acceleration or Metal Support when connected to TB3 MBP. All the supporting kexts loaded and external monitor work through the eGPU though. Any ideas? Not alarming if the speed activates to 20Gb/s x2 with a Belkin 40Gb/s cable and TB3 chassis. This should lead you on the right track: https://www.techinferno.com/index.php?/forums/topic/10057-automate-egpu-efi-mac-bootscreen-on-egpu/&do=findComment&comment=151531 However, I suppose that you’ve already done so. Hopefully the problem is due to the bidirectional TB3-TB2-adapter. How did you check Metal acceleration? If OpenCL works, the -clpeak option may give us clues about transfer bandwidth in GBps (enqueueWriteBuffer/enqueueReadBuffer). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodhawk Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Here is the CUDA-Z with GTX 1080 hooked up over TB3 (DSL6540 - Dual Port) to a P870DM-G (DSL6340 - Single Port) Output : Spoiler CUDA-Z Report ============= Version: 0.10.251 64 bit http://cuda-z.sf.net/ OS Version: Windows x86 6.2.9200 Driver Version: 375.70 Driver Dll Version: 8.0 (6.14.13.7570) Runtime Dll Version: 6.50 Core Information ---------------- Name: GeForce GTX 1080 Compute Capability: 6.1 Clock Rate: 1733.5 MHz PCI Location: 0:10:0 Multiprocessors: 20 Threads Per Multiproc.: 2048 Warp Size: 32 Regs Per Block: 65536 Threads Per Block: 1024 Threads Dimensions: 1024 x 1024 x 64 Grid Dimensions: 2147483647 x 65535 x 65535 Watchdog Enabled: Yes Integrated GPU: No Concurrent Kernels: Yes Compute Mode: Default Stream Priorities: Yes Memory Information ------------------ Total Global: 8192 MiB Bus Width: 256 bits Clock Rate: 5005 MHz Error Correction: No L2 Cache Size: 48 KiB Shared Per Block: 48 KiB Pitch: 2048 MiB Total Constant: 64 KiB Texture Alignment: 512 B Texture 1D Size: 131072 Texture 2D Size: 131072 x 65536 Texture 3D Size: 16384 x 16384 x 16384 GPU Overlap: Yes Map Host Memory: Yes Unified Addressing: Yes Async Engine: Yes, Bidirectional Performance Information ----------------------- Memory Copy Host Pinned to Device: 2147.95 MiB/s Host Pageable to Device: 1919.76 MiB/s Device to Host Pinned: 2678.09 MiB/s Device to Host Pageable: 2304.06 MiB/s Device to Device: 114.298 GiB/s GPU Core Performance Single-precision Float: 8701.88 Gflop/s Double-precision Float: 284.502 Gflop/s 64-bit Integer: 470.519 Giop/s 32-bit Integer: 2619.8 Giop/s 24-bit Integer: 2016.1 Giop/s Generated: Mon Oct 31 21:09:50 2016 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakebanana Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 (edited) Tried today hooking up my 13" 2-port 2016 MBP via an active 40Gb/s TB3 cable - same results from system_profiler, "Up to 20 Gb/s x1". eGPU still not detected via EFI utility or anything else. Edited November 1, 2016 by fakebanana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euqlaog Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 5 minutes ago, fakebanana said: Tried today hooking up my 13" 2-port 2016 MBP via an active 40Gb/s TB3 cable - same results from system_profiler, "Up to 20 Gb/s x1". eGPU still not detected via EFI utility or anything else. And says “Unsupported”? Then it’s a firmware issue. Akitio Node is compatible: https://www.akitio.com/blog/articles/akitio-thunderbolt3-devices-macbook-pro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakebanana Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 I just got it to work in Windows 10. Roughly the same results in CUDA-Z as with the Spectre x360. This suggests it's a software issue, right? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gen. Crocket Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 (edited) 17 minutes ago, fakebanana said: I just got it to work in Windows 10. Roughly the same results in CUDA-Z as with the Spectre x360. This suggests it's a software issue, right? Woah! Does the internal screen work / how's the performance? How'd you get it working? Sorry for the questions, this gets me excited Edited November 1, 2016 by Gen. Crocket Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakebanana Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 I just installed Razer Synapse, the Razer GFX card switcher, and the Nvidia drivers - I didn't have to do anything special (and I suspect the Razer software isn't actually required). When I installed Windows 10, I noticed that the Intel thunderbolt software that's normally present wasn't installed. I installed a copy, but got an error when running it that "This application is not supported on Boot Camp. (Thunderbolt devices and networking will work correctly). I did notice that when I use the short passive cable that came with the core, the Core seems to power cycle itself a lot more on boot than with the active cable (they both work though). One last caveat is that while the Core will power the MBP, if you've got the Apple power brick plugged in (so that the MBP is drawing from that instead), Windows will blue screen if you unplug the power. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leocanela Posted November 1, 2016 Author Share Posted November 1, 2016 Hey @fakebanana, so, you got it working on 2016 MBP with bootcamp, right? Does the I/O in the Razer Core work aswell (internet and usb)? Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakebanana Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 1 minute ago, leocanela said: Hey @fakebanana, so, you got it working on 2016 MBP with bootcamp, right? Does the I/O in the Razer Core work aswell (internet and usb)? Thanks Yes, USB and ethernet both work too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euqlaog Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 (edited) There are too many factors to make final conclusions from CUDA-Z. Razer Core needs a firmware update in order to be Late 2016 13” MBP compatible on macOS/OS X. This cannot be fixed by software. Akitio claims only 6-8% difference compared to the motherboard: https://www.akitio.com/faq/305-node-is-the-performance-identical-for-internal-and-external-gpus And 2-6% drop compared to a 20Gbps cable: https://www.akitio.com/faq/306-node-can-i-use-a-20-gbps-thunderbolt-3-cable Sounds a contradiction. I guess the test was not CPU intensive. A quad core CPU is still needed in CPU intensive gaming. A dual core i5-6200U (XPS 13) drops the frame rate by nearly 15fps compared to the i7-6700HQ in Tomb Raider benchmark: https://www.computerbase.de/2016-10/powercolor-devil-box-test/4/ Edited November 1, 2016 by goalque 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted November 2, 2016 Share Posted November 2, 2016 Wow I'm looking forward to this Akitio Node already! So what we've also learnt here is that not all TB3 eGPU boxes work the same way either. @fakebanana have you tried the hot-plugging the Core on Windows? Just wondering if that feature works as well. The only other question now is whether TB2 enclosures will work using the TB2-TB3 adapter... I just I'll just have to find out when my MBP with the touch bar arrives! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.