johnksss

Yep. One of mine. Not the stolen version of the one posted at the beginning of this thread.

Dang, it's been a while since i Posted anything over here.

Decided to go ahead and bench the 6820HK/1070N. It would seem this little beast knocked out all the competition in it's class at the moment. Being BGA and all. http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_gtx_1070_notebook_mxm/

Now this is interesting.....

Yep. This is true. You certainly did have a bad luck run on gpus, but it's always nice to actually get some good ones from time to time. Side Note: That score was hidden because it's over all score was lower.

At the end of the day....After the numbers are crunched....They are still the same. A half of a fps does not really settle things.

There you go speed racer. http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11456296

It's because on a laptop you can not control the load line calibration setting. On most desktop boards you can control this thus locking the voltage in place.

I found during my testing that it does still work in our favor for a variety of benches, that is for sure.

Just load another ssd is all.

The score is definitely a 1070. 100% sure of that. 100% sure his 980M is not 2k/2k And the machine in question is a https://www.google.com/search?q=Terrans+Force+X799&rlz=1C1CHZL_enUS707US707&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZtvaLloXPAhUQzGMKHbSsAmYQ_AUICigD&biw=2560&bih=1274#imgrc=qmeM6AgjWzp0lM%3A So maybe a TB2/TB3 1070 is what he used. Their website is too damn slow to load. Seems they have a 1070 model as well, still...not sure how the 980M is in there unless they used maybe mini pcie to 1070

It is reading wrong..... He has a 1070 also.

Sorry, miss read that. You need to run a modded vbios with higher voltage.

It takes a memory volt mode to get things rolling.....

Yep.

Physics is for the cpu. No GPU involvement. I'll let you guys figure out the tech aspects of it. I'm just going to bench it and move on.

Getting better @D2ultima Higher Physics Score, but it still lost. http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/10073122/fs/10073016

My apologies though! I did not mean to offend Side note Good thing physics is on it's way out the door.

Yep, because of an os slow down i can't seem to get straighten out yet. Im actually 500+ points behind from what pap was saying. http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/3489139/fs/7284874/fs/6599319 http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/3489139/fs/7284874/fs/6599319/fs/6040190

I think you should go and read my edit's...:) Edit: Yep. Why don't you go disable sli and find out for yourself. I'll wait right here. Unless you have a 6920hq/980N setup? Then I already know that answer as well.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9595299 That is a 6700k, where do you get 6920hq from that? I think you might want to go back and check first before jumping the gun my friend.... These are more closer to what you should be looking at. http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/10011170/fs/10001580/fs/10059807 And like i have pointed out many times before. A single gpu physics score will always be higher unless the person benching does not know what they are doing by a very very long shot. (Apparently not the case with 6920HQ and 980N. See below) http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/9269885/fs/7575204/fs/8619427/fs/7602138/fs/9312667/fs/10053831 But this one is the one that would prove your point.. And now I understand why hmscott made the comment about higher physics with dual cards. That would seem to hold true for the 6920HQ. http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/10053831/fs/7808124/fs/8437252/fs/8124431

This is exactly why things go the way they do. Why don't you try matching it with a SINGLE gpu setup like it was meant to be compared to in stead of thinking you found the holy grail of mistakes made. http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/9988160/fs/9595299 Edit: And I have explained this thing with physics quite a few times already, but no one seems to get it so I shut up about it. Those that figure it out see the gains while others do not.

Desktop cards are now caught.