Ok guys I have supplemented my table with a AMD R9 270X and a AMD HD 7770. Furthermore, I will initially wanted to quit the eGPU subject because I have my GTX 770 packed into my PC. There, I have an Intel Quad-Core, which will be superior in the future games. But probably I continue to be active in the german Forum.Of the request of Nando4 here the table:My System; Lenovo X220, BIOS 1.39 (no-whitelist), i7-2640M, 8GB Ram, mSata-SSD 256GB and HDD 1TB and a PE4L-EC100A V2.1b
Grafikkarten, Verbindung
3DMark 06
3DMark Vantage
3DMark 11
3DMark (2013)
GTX 770, x16.2 ext.
19039* (100%)
25598 (100%)
10989 (100%)
246409 / 51774 / 7778 (100%/100%/100%)
GTX 770, x1.2 Opt. ext.
20099* (106%)
27584 (108%)
8748 (80%)
145922 / 39660 / 6624 (59%/77%/85%)
GTX 770, x1.2 Opt. int.
17943* (94%)
23062 (90%)
7993 (73%)
22746 / 21779 / 5781 (9%/42%/74%)
GTX 770, x1.1 Opt. ext.
19837* (104%)
23786 (93%)
7818 (71%)
112794 / 35436 / 6212 (46%/68%/80%)
GTX 770, x1.1 Opt. int.
12918* (68%)
15262 (60%)
6109 (56%)
11349 / 11220 / 4558 (5%/22%/59%)
GTX 660, x16.2 ext.
19112* (100%)
22751 (100%)
6556 (100%)
232266 / 34004 / 4746 (100%/100%/100%)
GTX 660, x1.2 Opt. ext.
18953* (99%)
20124 (88%)
5698 (87%)
131392 / 27756 / 4264 (56%/82%/90%)
GTX 660, x1.2 Opt. int.
17612* (92%)
17849 (78%)
5524 (84%)
22995 / 18465 / 3980 (10%/54%/84%)
GTX 660, x1.1 Opt. ext.
18860* (99%)
17670 (78%)
5355 (82%)
100774 / 25507 / 4068 (43%/75%/87%)
GTX 660, x1.1 Opt. int.
12910* (68%)
12827 (56%)
4647 (71%)
11350 / 10606 / 3356 (5%/31%/71%)
GTX 560 TI 448, x16.2 ext.
18905* (100%)
20781 (100%)
5201 (100%)
229377 / 33262 / 4330 (100%/100%/100%)
GTX 560 TI 448, x1.2 Opt. ext.
19295* (102%)
18162 (87%)
4838 (93%)
126747 / 27255 / 3722 (55%/82%/86%)
GTX 560 TI 448, x1.2 Opt. int.
17612* (94%)
17335 (83%)
4795 (92%)
22432 / 21072 / 3599 (10%/63%/83%)
GTX 560 TI 448, x1.1 Opt. ext.
18999* (101%)
16092 (77%)
4614 (89%)
100186 / 24734 / 3495 (44%/74%/81%)
GTX 560 TI 448, x1.1 Opt. int.
12964* (69%)
13553 (65%)
4300 (83%)
11352 / 11220 / 3113 (5%/34%/72%)
R9 270X x16.3 ext.
24944* (100%)
-
8275 (100%)
248341 / 40418 / 6163 (100%/100%/100%)
R9 270X x1.2 ext.
16336* (65,5%)
-
7273 (87,9%)
113338 / 34693 / 5417 (45,6%/85,8%/88%)
R9 270X x1.1 ext.
15564* (62,4%)
-
6585 (79,6%)
89156 / 30596 / 4848 (35,9%/75,7%/78,7%)
Radeon HD 7770 x16.2 ext.
16636* (100%)
14667 (100%)
4044 (100%)
158657 / 19143 / 2868 (100%/100%/100%)
Radeon HD 7770 x1.2 ext.
14427* (86,7%)
12387 (84,4%)
3595 (88,9%)
86402 / 17264 / 2610 (54,4%/90,2%/91%)
Radeon HD 7770 x1.1 ext.
13667* (82,1%)
11173 (76,2%)
3405 (84,2%)
67712 / 15738 / 2429 (42,7%/82,2%/84,7%)
HD 4870, x16.2 ext.
13975* (100%)
9312
-
124249 / 14395 / - (100%/100%/-)
HD 4870, x1.2 ext.
4724* (34%)
-
-
72526 / 12044 / - (58%/84%/-)
HD 4870, x1.1 ext.
3958* (28%)
-
-
49071 / 9670 / - (40%/67%/-)
Intel HD 3000 int.
3837*
1446
-
28054 / 2673 / -
* = total valuex16.2 = a x16 connection with PCI-e 2.0x16.3 = a x16 connection with PCI-e 3.0x1.2 = a x1 connection with PCI-e 2.0x1.1 = a x1 connection with PCI-e 1.0Opt. = Optimusext. = external Monitorint. = Laptop Monitor(XXX%) = total value of the CPU and GPU, as CPU and system differently, you should consider this value wisely.Soon, I supplement an AMD R9 290 / 290X.