CLG Posted March 25, 2015 Share Posted March 25, 2015 I'm looking to upgrade my graphics card and have a budget of $325 or less. Here is my current setup:AMD 1090TASRock 990FX Extreme4 8 GB G.Skill Ripjaws 1600 XFX HD687060 GB OCZ Solid 3 SATA III SSD1.0 TB Seagate Barracuda 7200 RPM SATA III600W Coolermaster Silent Pro M600 ATX12V power supplyWindows 7 Professional 64-bitMost of my use is with Adobe photo development products (photoshop, indesign, and illustrator), scientific imaging software (e.g. Imaris), and a few games (e.g. Guild Wars 2) using a dual-monitor (Dell U2312HM) setup. I have no loyalty to either AMD or Nvidia, I'm just looking for the best card given my budget and system. That said, if PhysX or Mantle provide any worthwhile benefit for what I may be using, please let me know. If my graphics capacity is going to be bottlenecked by other components, such as the processor or memory, I'm willing to upgrade those as well, but would prefer to start with the graphics card.Any insight is appreciated! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonytotheB Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 If you don't mind the whole 3.5GB issue, the 970 is a beast of a card. It's around $330-350 on NeweggThe 960 is also a good cardGeForce GTX 970 vs 960http://www.hwcompare.com/18105/geforce-gtx-970-vs-radeon-hd-6870/I don't think your setup would bottleneck a single 970 or 960Good luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Posted March 27, 2015 Author Share Posted March 27, 2015 Thanks for the recommendation. Pardon my ignorance, but what is the 3.5GB issue? Not that I've seen fractional RAM on anything before, but is it problematic? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karza Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 Agreed with TonytotheB. GTX 960 has a good bang for buck. Although, i'm a little worried if the CPU's going to bottleneck your system a bit. You could narrow the bottleneck by throwing a bit of OC on the X6 CPU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnman Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 The GTX 960 is really good. And yeah, he's right, the CPU is likely to be more of a bottleneck than the GPU at that point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KCPTECH Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w:DontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--> The nVidia GTX-970 will be a little over 300% faster than your AMD HD-6870. Also, the GTX 970 consumes less power than your AMD card, by about 6 watts; so your power supply will be okay. The GTX-960 is around 230% faster than your AMD HD-6870. Power consumption is even lower at around 120 Watts. The GTX970 since being nVidia has proprietary CUDA cores, some 1664. Adobe Creative suite tools for video like Premier and other graphics apps use a feature call the Mercury Engine. The Mercury Engine is a dedicated core language that runs specifically on the CUDA Cores making real-time photo and visual fast. To enable this, you will need to find a file in the CS directory of Premier and other apps called GPUSupport.ini and simply add the name of your card like GTX 970. Adobe Creative Suite originally only includes support listing for the professional Quadro series with CUDA. But the GTX 9800 and up also have CUDA and work fine. There’s a GPU sniffer files to help you find the exact listing you’re your video card. As to the CPU, the AMD’s have always had a cache speed and system memory bandwidth than the Intel Core “I” series. You CPU (6 core 1090T) is about 40% slower at memory executions and transfers than the Intel Core i7 4790 for example. Cost of the GTX 970 4GB cards will put you over $325 US for a decent card. Cost of the GTX 960 4GB cards will be a little over $225 US. Cards to look for are those with an open large fans and a good heat pipe solution. Gigabyte and ASUS make some good models that run pretty cool. ASUS is one of the few that always put their patented power regulation circuits on rather than using the lower level stock design from nVidia. <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]--> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atorre Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 I would not compare the 2 cards like that. the gtx 970 runs newest(2014,2015 and upcoming) games on1080p ultra with 60 fps easily most of the time. with the 960 you are limited to medium textures and medium settings because of vram size and bandwidth. There is no point in buying the gtx 9604gb version because the bandwidth and process power is not enough for 4gb vram anyway... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faranos Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 I buyed a GTX980 It replaces my old GTX560 TiThe performance plus is amazing.i dont choose the gtx970 cause of the 3,5GB and 0,5GB GDDR build with the low bandwith at the 0,5 -.-I really dont know what nvidia builds tehre ^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
repah Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 For this price i recomended Gigabyte R9 390 Gaming G1 ; Radeon R9 390 establishes effective competition with the GeForce GTX 970 , at least if we look at the standard clock of both devices. And big + for Fall in your budget Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avl_avl_avl Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 For about 320$ you can't go wrong with a MSI GTX 970 GTX 970 GAMING 100ME MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 GAMING 100 Million Edition OC 4GB GDDR5 2DVI/HDMI/DisplayPort PCI-Express Video Card - NVIDIA GeForce - SuperBiiz.com, that whole 3.5GB+0.5GB GDDR has been proved to have little effect on real life performance. The alternative would be a Radeon R9 390X, it has been tested to have similar and sometimes better performance to the 970 but while consuming more power and having higher temps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azibiz Posted October 21, 2015 Share Posted October 21, 2015 GTX970 is a good choice for the money I recon. Gigabyte GTX970 (3 fans) is well worth the money Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koki1337 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 Just to back up other people's recommendations, GTX 970. I picked up a MSI Tiger version of the GTX 970, and I'm loving it. Don't mind the 3.5GB VRAM issue unless you're gaming on 4K. If you're running on 2560x1080 like I do now, then it's going to be more than enough!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyhigh123 Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 i too am looking for something as well. Will take your recs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soumen08 Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 I'd go with the 970. It has the benefit of utilizing your budget properly and you do end up getting quite a bit more performance than the 960. The new versions of the adobe products have gotten more and more GPU intensive. I'd expect to have a longer return on investment with the 970 than the 960 and a hundred bucks of cash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alixalman Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Hands down 970. It shouldn't even be a choice. A 980 is not worth the extra bucks. 970 is one beast of a card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pomme_de_terror Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 I agree with most here, the 970 is a great card with low power draw and great 1080p performance. as for clarification of the 3.5gb VRAM issue. It was basically because it has 4gb of vram but only 3.5gb of the 4 is high bandwitdth, so once you hit over 3.5gb of use (which is nearly impossible at 1080p) performance will drop. One consideration though is that your cpu will most likely be a bottleneck, so you might want to upgrade that and get a 960 which also a great card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavkic Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 Yeah... I'd get the 970 if I were you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grfgrf Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 970 all the way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
intuxikated Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 (edited) 970 or a R9 390, i'd personally get the 390 because it does perform slightly better than the 970 (unless it's a game with nvidia technologies like hairworks) but if you want the nvidia technologies the 970 is also a great card, and the AMD cards also have hardware-based Async implementation vs the software based implementation nvidia has, which gives the AMD cards a clear edge in future games using DX12 or Vulkan. Edited April 7, 2016 by intuxikated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
viktoris Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 How long can you wait? I am a laptop user for years waiting on AMD to step up their game and now it seems with ZEN and the new RX cards I will finally make a build somewhere (hopefully Q1) next year and live in peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iForeverNoob Posted August 9, 2016 Share Posted August 9, 2016 I honestly think 1080 is the way to go. Or you can get 970 like me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.