Jump to content

12" HP 2570P + GTX970@4Gbps+c-EC2 (PE4L 2.1b) + Win7 [UncleJam]


Recommended Posts

Notebook and eGPU equipment

  • 12" HP Elitebook 2570P with Intel HD4000 iGPU
  • i7-3820QM 2.7Ghz quad-core 45W CPU
  • 12GB RAM
  • Gigabyte GTX 970, Windforce UDV OC (I've never overclocked yet)
  • PE4L 2.1b, 4Gbps+c-EC2 (1.2 Opt) using expresscard 2.0
  • Windows 7 Pro 64-bit
  • Setup 1.30 + DSDT override software configuration
  • Samsung TV Pavv 46" external LCD, 1920*1080p resolution

post-28294-14494998594769_thumb.jpg [ATTACH=CONFIG]12928[/ATTACH]

Internal LCD

post-28294-14494998595363_thumb.jpg

External LCD

[ATTACH=CONFIG]12926[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]12927[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]12929[/ATTACH]

Benchmarks

Internal LCD:

3dmark13-FS.gpu = 7868, compard to i7-4790 + GTX970=11094. It's about 70 %

3dmark11.gpu = 10886

3dmark06 = Failed IDirect3DDevice 9 : Clearfailed : Invalid call error, Future mark said there's no known solution

Hitman Absolution benchmark (8x mxaa, Ultra option 1366*768 resolution) Min. 38.8 Max.60.3 Avg.47.2

post-28294-14494998601811_thumb.jpg

External LCD:

3dmark13-FS.gpu = 9954

3dmark11.gpu = 12505

3dmark06 = 26833

Experience

Hi guys, I live in Seoul, South Korea. So please understand that my primary language is not English.

Recently I bought Gigabyte GTX 970 Windforce UDV OC. I have challenge to solve error 12 using DSDT override and PCI compaction. Finally I could solve the problem with Nando's egpu setup 1.30. Thanks again, Nando.

I played TombRaider 2013 about 30 minutes (yeah, I like Lara.) Using internal LCD, I set the graphic option as "Ultra" and changed anti-aliasing option as 4Xs saa. So, its the ultimate option to this game. I check frame rate my self with fraps 3.59, I've seen the moment of frame, lowest as 30FPS and highest as 78FPS. Usually, It was around 40~50 FPS. Of course, it's Opt 1.2 setting.

Using external LCD to the internal monitor opt. 1.2 setting, it's quite progressed. (You can see it in my signature)

And I have fun time playing with Tombraider again :-)

Thank you :)

post-28294-14494998594963_thumb.jpg

post-28294-14494998595174_thumb.jpg

post-28294-1449499859557_thumb.gif

  • Thumbs Up 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@UncleJam, thank you for submitting your implementaiton details. Would you mind including the 3dmark11 and 3dmark06 benchmark result runs using an external LCD to the post at: http://forum.techinferno.com/diy-e-gpu-projects/2109-diy-egpu-experiences-%5Bversion-2-0%5D-404.html#post110325 ? Doing so means can add you to the appropriate position into http://forum.techinferno.com/diy-e-gpu-projects/6578-implementations-hub-tb-ec-mpcie.html .

Needless to say, 2570P eGPUs owners would be interested to see the results of your i7-quad and fresh GTX970 to compare against their rigs.

Okay. I'll install it and post it later. It's very honor to be a "reference" with my rigs.

+ I did it now I'll add to the original post

post-28294-14494998599869_thumb.jpg

post-28294-14494998599306_thumb.jpg

post-28294-14494998599496_thumb.jpg

post-28294-14494998599682_thumb.jpg

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay. I'll install it and post it later. It's very honor to be a "reference" with my rigs.

+ I did it now I'll add to the original post

Your 3dmark06 score is showing a slow CPU score netting you an overall 22.5k score. Please set your Power profile to maximum performance and re-run. I'd anticipate you getting over 27,000 when set correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, that's exactly what I mean. Pls change from the balanced to the high-performance power plan and then re-run 3dmark06. Result should be significantly better than your previous 22.5k. I anticipate ~27k.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3820QM Processor,Hewlett-Packard 17DF

I changed the setting, but, it's not quite different. Maybe some other issue could be the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3820QM Processor,Hewlett-Packard 17DF

I changed the setting, but, it's not quite different. Maybe some other issue could be the problem.

You are way lower than I'd expect given you are running Windows 7. Consider comparison to my significantly faster results with what should be a slower GTX770 card:

Score=28209 (SM2.0=10815 SM3.0=13952 CPU=7113) <- [email protected] + GTX770@4Gbps+c (Tech Inferno Fan)

Score=22837 (SM2.0=8359 SM3.0=11694 CPU=6074) <- [email protected] + GTX970@4Gbps+c (UncleJam)

Please ensure you have the latest Futuremark SystemInfo and newest 3dmark06 V1.21 installed. Then re-do tests again. You should be seeing ~27k if it was all working as expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are way lower than I'd expect given you are running Windows 7. Consider comparison to my significantly faster results with what should be a slower GTX770 card:

Score=28209 (SM2.0=10815 SM3.0=13952 CPU=7113) <- [email protected] + GTX770@4Gbps+c (Tech Inferno Fan)

Score=22837 (SM2.0=8359 SM3.0=11694 CPU=6074) <- [email protected] + GTX970@4Gbps+c (UncleJam)

Please ensure you have the latest Futuremark SystemInfo and newest 3dmark06 V1.21 installed. Then re-do tests again. You should be seeing ~27k if it was all working as expected.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3820QM Processor,Hewlett-Packard 17DF

I tested again and got this result. as you expected It's almost 27k . Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3820QM Processor,Hewlett-Packard 17DF

I tested again and got this result. as you expected It's almost 27k . Thanks.

Hello UncleJam, Im korean as well, could you tell me what you did in Korean?

I'm having hard time with my DSDT.. Im not so familiar with those..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.