Jump to content

[Performance] x16 2.0 Desktop vs x1 2.0 eGPU - GTX770 + R9 270x


Ivxy

Recommended Posts

Ok guys I have supplemented my table with a AMD R9 270X and a AMD HD 7770. Furthermore, I will initially wanted to quit the eGPU subject because I have my GTX 770 packed into my PC. There, I have an Intel Quad-Core, which will be superior in the future games. 
But probably I continue to be active in the german Forum.

Of the request of Nando4 here the table:
My System; Lenovo X220, BIOS 1.39 (no-whitelist), i7-2640M, 8GB Ram, mSata-SSD 256GB and HDD 1TB and a PE4L-EC100A V2.1b

Grafikkarten, Verbindung 3DMark 06 3DMark Vantage 3DMark 11 3DMark (2013)
         
GTX 770, x16.2 ext. 19039* (100%) 25598 (100%) 10989 (100%) 246409 / 51774 / 7778 (100%/100%/100%)
GTX 770, x1.2 Opt. ext. 20099* (106%) 27584 (108%) 8748 (80%) 145922 / 39660 / 6624 (59%/77%/85%)
GTX 770, x1.2 Opt. int. 17943* (94%) 23062 (90%) 7993 (73%) 22746 / 21779 / 5781 (9%/42%/74%)
GTX 770, x1.1 Opt. ext. 19837* (104%) 23786 (93%) 7818 (71%) 112794 / 35436 / 6212 (46%/68%/80%)
GTX 770, x1.1 Opt. int. 12918* (68%) 15262 (60%) 6109 (56%) 11349 / 11220 / 4558 (5%/22%/59%)
         
GTX 660, x16.2 ext. 19112* (100%) 22751 (100%) 6556 (100%) 232266 / 34004 / 4746 (100%/100%/100%)
GTX 660, x1.2 Opt. ext. 18953* (99%) 20124 (88%) 5698 (87%) 131392 / 27756 / 4264 (56%/82%/90%)
GTX 660, x1.2 Opt. int. 17612* (92%) 17849 (78%) 5524 (84%) 22995 / 18465 / 3980 (10%/54%/84%)
GTX 660, x1.1 Opt. ext. 18860* (99%) 17670 (78%) 5355 (82%) 100774 / 25507 / 4068 (43%/75%/87%)
GTX 660, x1.1 Opt. int. 12910* (68%) 12827 (56%) 4647 (71%) 11350 / 10606 / 3356 (5%/31%/71%)
         
GTX 560 TI 448, x16.2 ext. 18905* (100%) 20781 (100%) 5201 (100%) 229377 / 33262 / 4330 (100%/100%/100%)
GTX 560 TI 448, x1.2 Opt. ext. 19295* (102%) 18162 (87%) 4838 (93%) 126747 / 27255 / 3722 (55%/82%/86%)
GTX 560 TI 448, x1.2 Opt. int. 17612* (94%) 17335 (83%) 4795 (92%) 22432 / 21072 / 3599 (10%/63%/83%)
GTX 560 TI 448, x1.1 Opt. ext. 18999* (101%) 16092 (77%) 4614 (89%) 100186 / 24734 / 3495 (44%/74%/81%)
GTX 560 TI 448, x1.1 Opt. int. 12964* (69%) 13553 (65%) 4300 (83%) 11352 / 11220 / 3113 (5%/34%/72%)
         
R9 270X x16.3 ext. 24944* (100%) - 8275 (100%) 248341 / 40418 / 6163 (100%/100%/100%)
R9 270X x1.2 ext. 16336* (65,5%) - 7273 (87,9%) 113338 / 34693 / 5417 (45,6%/85,8%/88%)
R9 270X x1.1 ext. 15564* (62,4%) - 6585 (79,6%) 89156 / 30596 / 4848 (35,9%/75,7%/78,7%)
         
Radeon HD 7770 x16.2 ext. 16636* (100%) 14667 (100%) 4044 (100%) 158657 / 19143 / 2868 (100%/100%/100%)
Radeon HD 7770 x1.2 ext. 14427* (86,7%) 12387 (84,4%) 3595 (88,9%) 86402 / 17264 / 2610 (54,4%/90,2%/91%)
Radeon HD 7770 x1.1 ext. 13667* (82,1%) 11173 (76,2%) 3405 (84,2%) 67712 / 15738 / 2429 (42,7%/82,2%/84,7%)
         
HD 4870, x16.2 ext. 13975* (100%) 9312 - 124249 / 14395 / - (100%/100%/-)
HD 4870, x1.2 ext. 4724* (34%) - - 72526 / 12044 / - (58%/84%/-)
HD 4870, x1.1 ext. 3958* (28%) - - 49071 / 9670 / - (40%/67%/-)
         
Intel HD 3000 int. 3837* 1446 - 28054 / 2673 / -

* = total value
x16.2 = a x16 connection with PCI-e 2.0
x16.3 = a x16 connection with PCI-e 3.0
x1.2 = a x1 connection with PCI-e 2.0
x1.1 = a x1 connection with PCI-e 1.0
Opt. = Optimus
ext. = external Monitor
int. = Laptop Monitor
(XXX%) = total value of the CPU and GPU, as CPU and system differently, you should consider this value wisely.

Soon, I supplement an AMD R9 290 / 290X.

  • Thumbs Up 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.