Jump to content
Brian

[BENCHMARKS] The OFFICIAL Thread

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Fox said:

No, that won't do it. It needs more voltage to go past 1500ish on core. Around 1535 or so the driver crashes (TDR) about 5 to 10 seconds into a benchmark due to lack of core voltage when the GPU is still around 30°C. It's not having black-screen issues or lockups or anything like that.

Hmm... maybe it does. Maybe the lack of voltage only happens under LN2 temps. But okay. That's too bad though.

 

Question, does it happen with memory at stock as well?

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, D2ultima said:

Hmm... maybe it does. Maybe the lack of voltage only happens under LN2 temps. But okay. That's too bad though.

 

Question, does it happen with memory at stock as well?

Yes, no change in behavior based on memory clocks. The memory does not affect it. The voltage adjustment is also for core only. And, it takes the full 1.250V for 1500. If I drop it to say 1.225V the core max is around 1475. It's not a bad thing though. Nothing wrong with using more voltage as long as you keep it cool. Same applies for CPUs. You use what it needs, nothing more, nothing less.

 

The 4790K pulled 245W in the physics test in that 4.9GHz Fire Strike run, LOL. Almost exactly same power demand as the 4930MX CPU.

 

All of this fun is for AC cooled benching only. Trying to do this on air could potentially kill the GPU and certainly isn't "helpful" to the CPU.

 

The only sad part is the sketchy cooling system these Batman notebooks have. I see the new Pascal version of the same is having some thermal management issues as well. A unified heat sink is not a good design. They should have made the P7XX series about 0.25 inch thicker, with bigger radiators, bigger fans and discrete CPU/GPU heat sinks. That would have been much better.

  • Thumbs Up 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

Yes, no change in behavior based on memory clocks. The memory does not affect it. The voltage adjustment is also for core only. And, it takes the full 1.250V for 1500. If I drop it to say 1.225V the core max is around 1475. It's not a bad thing though. Nothing wrong with using more voltage as long as you keep it cool. Same applies for CPUs. You use what it needs, nothing more, nothing less.

 

The 4790K pulled 245W in the physics test in that 4.9GHz Fire Strike run, LOL. Almost exactly same power demand as the 4930MX CPU.

 

All of this fun is for AC cooled benching only. Trying to do this on air could potentially kill the GPU and certainly isn't "helpful" to the CPU.

 

The only sad part is the sketchy cooling system these Batman notebooks have. I see the new Pascal version of the same is having some thermal management issues as well. A unified heat sink is not a good design. They should have made the P7XX series about 0.25 inch thicker, with bigger radiators, bigger fans and discrete CPU/GPU heat sinks. That would have been much better.

So P775dm3 cooling is not perfect aswell, right? How is P870DM3 cooling, is it better? Or maybe p670 is best since heatsinks are not united?

Edited by wersuss
  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, wersuss said:

So P775dm3 cooling is not perfect aswell, right? How is P870DM3 cooling, is it better? Or maybe p670 is best since heatsinks are not united?

I cannot say anything about systems that I don't have available for my own testing except I don't know. P870DM cooling was superb. When I can secure a P870DM3, then I will be able to comment. If the P670 has a BGA CPU, it cannot be viewed as an acceptable product even if it has a good cooling system.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

I cannot say anything about systems that I don't have available for my own testing except I don't know. P870DM cooling was superb. When I can secure a P870DM3, then I will be able to comment. If the P670 has a BGA CPU, it cannot be viewed as an acceptable product even if it has a good cooling system. 

 

But P775dm3 cooling is not good enough?  Because i'm planning to buy p775 model but it's late.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

22 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

Looks like 1500 or so on GPU core is my max with a 1.250V limit (driver crashes due to lack of voltage). @Prema I think it will take 1.275V or 1.300V to hit 1600 on core.

 

OK,  put your benches where your mouth is big boy! :D

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Prema said:

 

 

OK,  put your benches where your mouth is big boy! :D

I'll be testing 1.275V and 1.300V this weekend to see how that works out. :hyper:

Wish me luck.

5 hours ago, wersuss said:

 

But P775dm3 cooling is not good enough?  Because i'm planning to buy p775 model but it's late.

I'm not sure, so I cannot give you an honest answer. It may be amazing or terrible, but I have no idea since I do not have one. The cooling system on my P750ZM is OK with the CPU running stock, but not very good with CPU overclocking. Even using AC cooling is just barely adequate for the CPU with a substantial overclock.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

I'll be testing 1.275V and 1.300V this weekend to see how that works out. :hyper:

Wish me luck.

I'm not sure, so I cannot give you an honest answer. It may be amazing or terrible, but I have no idea since I do not have one. The cooling system on my P750ZM is OK with the CPU running stock, but not very good with CPU overclocking. Even using AC cooling is just barely adequate for the CPU with a substantial overclock.

Thanks. Isn't p750 p775 cooling same?

Edited by wersuss
  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Prema said:

 

The system also has a 1070, and that score is in line with a stock 1070. Maybe the 1070's clocks were read as 980m clocks? A 1070 at 2ghz should be significantly higher than 17600 though, and 17600 is what I would expect to see from a 2ghz 980m.

 

I can't figure this out. Its not a BGA swap to a desktop card or else the memory would be 4GB. It could be an mxm to pci-e adapter with LN2 pot, but that would mean someone made an LN2 pot just for mxm cards on an adapter. Also in that case this score is not uploaded to hwbot, which an LN2 iser would definitely do.

 

I'm leaning towards a 980m not actually being in the system and systeminfo just being very wrong.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The score is definitely a 1070. 100% sure of that.

100% sure his 980M is not 2k/2k

And the machine in question is a 

https://www.google.com/search?q=Terrans+Force+X799&rlz=1C1CHZL_enUS707US707&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZtvaLloXPAhUQzGMKHbSsAmYQ_AUICigD&biw=2560&bih=1274#imgrc=qmeM6AgjWzp0lM%3A

So maybe a TB2/TB3 1070 is what he used. 

 

Their website is too damn slow to load. Seems they have a 1070 model as well, still...not sure how the 980M is in there unless they used maybe mini pcie to 1070

Edited by johnksss
  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Prema said:

 

40 minutes ago, johnksss said:

It is reading wrong.....

He has a 1070 also.

 

35 minutes ago, Khenglish said:

 

The system also has a 1070, and that score is in line with a stock 1070. Maybe the 1070's clocks were read as 980m clocks? A 1070 at 2ghz should be significantly higher than 17600 though, and 17600 is what I would expect to see from a 2ghz 980m.

 

I can't figure this out. Its not a BGA swap to a desktop card or else the memory would be 4GB. It could be an mxm to pci-e adapter with LN2 pot, but that would mean someone made an LN2 pot just for mxm cards on an adapter. Also in that case this score is not uploaded to hwbot, which an LN2 iser would definitely do.

 

I'm leaning towards a 980m not actually being in the system and systeminfo just being very wrong.

 

30 minutes ago, johnksss said:

The score is definitely a 1070. 100% sure of that.

100% sure his 980M is not 2k/2k

And the machine in question is a 

https://www.google.com/search?q=Terrans+Force+X799&rlz=1C1CHZL_enUS707US707&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZtvaLloXPAhUQzGMKHbSsAmYQ_AUICigD&biw=2560&bih=1274#imgrc=qmeM6AgjWzp0lM%3A

So maybe a TB2/TB3 1070 is what he used. 

 

Their website is too damn slow to load. Seems they have a 1070 model as well, still...not sure how the 980M is in there unless they used maybe mini pcie to 1070

 

I saw this the other day trying to figure out how I lost first place to that machine. I agree with John and believe it is connected to an eGPU. If so, that would explain why 1070 is listed as "secondary" GPU. I think the 3DMark database has the results wrong from that machine for sure.

3 hours ago, wersuss said:

Thanks. Isn't p750 p775 cooling same?

As far as I know it is, but they may have done something to improve the fit or design of the heat sink. I don't know. I hope it is better than the P750ZM. If it is not, then yeah... cooling system blows unless you run everything stock. Even on AC cooling it struggles with high CPU clocks because everything is way too small to be effective. Another reason thin and light shitbooks are sucky.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Brother @Prema, I can't quite make it to 1550 on core, but the additional voltage did help. Here are some new single 980M records for the P750ZM.

 

Straight up tie in 3DMark 11 against P570WM with 4960X. http://www.3dmark.com/compare/3dm11/9208097/3dm11/11568175

 

Brother @johnksss still holds #1 with the Xeon beast.

tied.JPG

 

3DMark 11http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11568175

pHashtG.jpg

Fire Strikehttp://www.3dmark.com/fs/10122415

br3ik0Q.jpg

Sky Diverhttp://www.3dmark.com/sd/4296564

ImI9YlS.jpg

 

Brother @D2ultima - max GPU temp was 46°C

  • Thumbs Up 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I am going to have to break my Windoze OS X RAID0 array and go back to Windows 7 to see how much the 3DMark 11 score improves. Those Windoze OS X physics scores are pretty damned shitty.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

I think I am going to have to break my Windoze OS X RAID0 array and go back to Windows 7 to see how much the 3DMark 11 score improves. Those Windoze OS X physics scores are pretty damned shitty.

Here's my run using the same clocks http://www.3dmark.com/compare/3dm11/11567233/3dm11/11567165 

 

Win7 beats Win10 physics+combined scores by about 7-8.9%. However in the graphics test, it is losing at double-digit percentages except graphics test number 4. We need @Prema mod to make it work like the one below :)

 

gtx 980 Win7 vs Win10 http://www.3dmark.com/compare/3dm11/11251942/3dm11/11244048 

  • Thumbs Up 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, dspboys said:

Here's my run using the same clocks http://www.3dmark.com/compare/3dm11/11567233/3dm11/11567165 

 

Win7 beats Win10 physics+combined scores by about 7-8.9%. However in the graphics test, it is losing at double-digit percentages except graphics test number 4. We need @Prema mod to make it work like the one below :)

 

gtx 980 Win7 vs Win10 http://www.3dmark.com/compare/3dm11/11251942/3dm11/11244048 

Windows 7 is a better OS than Windows 10, and that was a really nice run you posted.

  • Thumbs Up 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found during my testing that it does still work in our favor for a variety of benches, that is for sure.

  • Thumbs Up 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not seeing 970Ms for awhile, here are my 7 x 24 clocks for every day use.

CPU and caches: 4.6 GHz x 4 @ 1.235v

Ram: 3000 MHz 15-16-16-35 @ 1.20v

970M_0: 1304 MHz @ 1.05v + 6300 MHz vRam

970M_1: 1304 MHz @ 1.037v + 6300 MHz vRam

Catching up default score of 980M SLI: 

 

Fire Strike: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/10155379

Fire Strike Extreme: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/10156851

3DMark 11: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11576357

 

Thank you @Prema for fixing my throttling issue.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, coolane said:

Not seeing 970Ms for awhile, here are my 7 x 24 clocks for every day use.

CPU and caches: 4.6 GHz x 4 @ 1.235v

Ram: 3000 MHz 15-16-16-35 @ 1.20v

970M_0: 1304 MHz @ 1.05v + 6300 MHz vRam

970M_1: 1304 MHz @ 1.037v + 6300 MHz vRam

Catching up default score of 980M SLI: 

 

Fire Strike: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/10155379

Fire Strike Extreme: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/10156851

3DMark 11: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11576357

 

Thank you @Prema for fixing my throttling issue.

 

You have a very good CPU. 4.6GHz at just 1.235V is excellent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Khenglish said:

 

You have a very good CPU. 4.6GHz at just 1.235V is excellent.

Really? That's the input voltage in BIOS, the voltage under load in realbench is about 1.285 ~ 1.295v.

Usually it fluctuates in 1.35v ~ 1.39v when idle witch c states off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, coolane said:

Really? That's the input voltage in BIOS, the voltage under load in realbench is about 1.285 ~ 1.295v.

Usually it fluctuates in 1.35v ~ 1.39v when idle witch c states off.

 

Oh, ok so its not that great of a cpu then. I thought you had it locked to 1.235V.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Khenglish said:

 

Oh, ok so its not that great of a cpu then. I thought you had it locked to 1.235V.

I've never seen someone manage to lock voltage on a skylake chip. Manual/Static voltage doesn't work. The chips do what they want, though Manual voltage and offsets do have some kind of effect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Kunal Shrivastava
      Hi guys, I am the proud owner of a Clevo p775dm3-g notebook purchased from azom.systems (authorized Clevo reseller in India, Model rebranded as Azom Legion-17.3 inches). Here are my specs:

      Core i7 7700 (non-K version): undervolted by 110 mv and turbo boost disabled in BIOS- machine uses prema mod BIOS.
      GTX 1080: undervolted by 100 mv on all frequency steps using MSI afterburner voltage/frequency curve editor. clocks are untouched.
      16 GB DDR4: Cant remember clocks.
      1440p 120 Hz screen: No tinkering done to refresh rate.

      CPU has been delidded and repaste has been done on both CPU/GPU dies with gallium based TIM-Coolaboratory liquid ultra if I recall correctly.

      My issue is GPU hitting max temp limit of 90 degrees while playing DOOM and framerate drops from 110 avg to mid 60s-70s with horrible stuttering- this is thermal throttling for sure.

      System was running beautifully after repaste at 86 degrees max/ 77 degrees average at 100 percent fan speed. A month later I decided to see how much further I could push the system and ended up undervolting the CPU/GPU and RAM even further. The RAM undervolting part didnt work as well as I'd hoped, and I ended up resetting the BIOS to undo everything and reapply the previous setting (-110 for CPU with turbo boost disabled.) 

      I noticed that immediately after BIOS reset, both my CPU and GPU temps were 5-10 degrees higher even with the undervolt/underclock applied. Also, I think the fans were a bit louder before I reset the BIOS which leads me to believe that for some reason the fans are now capped at 80% max fan speed. There doesnt seem to be a fan speed selector in the BIOS or anywhere else so I cant say for sure whether this is a fan related issue or something else.Before the reset I could override the BIOS setting and set the fans to 100% by pressing fn+1, could I have done something to that setting after resetting the BIOS ? I dont think I have damaged the CPU or GPU as temps are holding fairly steady at 90-91 degrees and laptop doesn't shut down while gaming.

      If I have overlooked something or if anyone reading this has any solution help would be greatly appreciated.
      All settings/drivers/windows version/app version are exactly the same before and after BIOS reset.
    • By BAKED
      BAKED BIOS FOR TM, KM, DM, P6, P4 SERIES with most menus and options unlocked.
       
      THESE BIOS MODS ARE ONLY FOR PEOPLE WHO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING!
       
       
       
      NEW:
      I'VE BEEN BUSY WITH SOME STUFF PLUS MY SYSTEM HASN'T BEEN WORKING FOR SOME TIME BUT I SHOULD BE ABLE TO CONTINUE MY WORK SOON 
       
      I'M CURRENTLY WORKING ON V3.0 WHICH WILL INCLUDE UPDATED UEFI DRIVERS, MICROCODE BIOS SCREEN SHOT SUPPORT AMISCE SUPPORT(For some models) PLUS MORE. 
      I'M ALSO WORKING ON MODS FOR OTHER MODELS TOO.
      ALL TM, KM AND DM SERIES ARE V2.0 AND NOW HAVE WINDOWS FLASHER INSTEAD, JUST EXTRACT AND RUN FLASH.BAT
       
      WARNING! BIOS FLASHING IS RISKY SO MAKE SURE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING BEFORE PROCEEDING. 
      FLASHING THE WRONG BIOS OR INTERRUPTING THE FLASHING PROCESS WILL BRICK YOUR SYSTEM! 
      USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!
       
      TM, KM AND DM SERIES
       
      P6 AND P4 SERIES
       
      INSTRUCTIONS
        IF YOU LIKE MY WORK FEEL FRE TO BUY ME A COFFEE   ENJOY!
    • By racerxdl
      Hi all,
       
      It has been a while since I did anything to my laptop (Clevo P670RG-G) and since I recently got a VR Headset I wish I could overclock my GPU a little. So far the NVidia software (on windows) doesn't allow me to overclock it (the linux sort of allows, which some custom Xorg options) so I decided to give a try modding the vbios.
       
      I read all sorts of issues / guides about it, and it seens that the hardware topology (where the vbios is stored and how things are connected) changes from machine to machine.
       
      What I know about my laptop is that it has two VBios, one for Hybrid Mode and one for Discrete Mode. I'm currently running the discrete mode.
       
      I dumped my VBios using GPU-z and opened up in Maxwell II Bios Tweaker. Everything seens fine so far.
       
      So I have few questions about it:
       
      - There is a way to just unlock the VBios to show the overclocking options in NVidia software? (That way I dont need to reflash to change clocks)
      - I can just flash this GPU-z dump to my VBios?
      - If I brick my GPU, that GPU-z dumped image is the raw SPI image, so if I managed to physically access the VBios, I can just reflash over it?
      - I saw some people saying that I might need as well to flash the main laptop bios as well, is that really needed?
       
      Thanks!
       
      Lucas

    • By BAKED
      There are several threads on requesting BIOS modifications here on T | I but I thought another one wouldn't hurt.
       
            Your request should look like:
      Brand Model Type of modification(For example: Unlocked, added support, Logo, microcode, ME firmware etc  
      I'll respond as soon as I have time as I'm also currently working on other projects(Requests by PM is also ok)
      If anyone else have the knowledge and time feel free to respond to requests 
       
    • By ElChuterRD
      Greetings, I have a p650rs and I have this little problem that I can not play in MRHYBRID mode, only if the charger is connected, and I do not see high quality videos or play if it is in discret mode, if the A / C is connected.
       
      Any idea what it could be?
       
      I have the latest version of Bios and ECF
      I've been looking for custom-made Vbios but I can not find anything.
      Thank you


×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.